Egalitarianism is a theory of social justice that advocates for equal opportunities and outcomes for all individuals, regardless of their social or economic background. It seeks to eliminate social inequalities and promote a just and equitable society.

John Rawls' theory of justice, known as 'justice as fairness,' emphasizes the importance of prioritizing the least advantaged members of society. It argues that a just society should be structured in a way that ensures that the worst-off individuals are as well-off as possible.

Marxism is a theory of social justice that advocates for the redistribution of resources from the wealthy to the poor in order to achieve greater equality. It argues that capitalism is inherently exploitative and that a socialist society is necessary to create a just and equitable world.

Libertarian theories of social justice emphasize the importance of protecting individual liberty and autonomy. They argue that a just society is one in which individuals are free to make their own choices and pursue their own goals, without interference from the government or other external forces.

Utilitarianism is a theory of social justice that emphasizes the importance of maximizing aggregate utility, or the overall happiness and well-being of society. It argues that a just society is one in which the greatest happiness is achieved for the greatest number of people.

Distributive justice focuses on the fairness of the outcome, ensuring that resources and benefits are distributed equitably among individuals or groups. Procedural justice, on the other hand, focuses on the fairness of the process, ensuring that decisions are made in a fair and impartial manner.

Intersectionality is a theory of social justice that emphasizes the importance of recognizing and valuing the diverse identities and experiences of individuals, particularly those who face multiple forms of discrimination and marginalization. It argues that social justice cannot be achieved by addressing only one aspect of identity, such as race, gender, or class, but rather by considering the intersections of these identities and their impact on individuals' lives.

One of the main criticisms of Rawls' theory of justice is that it is too idealistic and impractical. Critics argue that the conditions of the 'original position,' where individuals are supposed to make decisions about the principles of justice without knowing their own social position, are unrealistic and difficult to achieve in practice.

Positive rights are rights to certain goods or services, such as the right to education, healthcare, or a minimum standard of living. Negative rights, on the other hand, are rights to be free from interference, such as the right to freedom of speech, religion, or assembly.

Marxism emphasizes the importance of addressing the root causes of inequality and oppression, arguing that capitalism is inherently exploitative and that a socialist society is necessary to create a just and equitable world. It seeks to transform the economic and social structures that perpetuate inequality and to empower the working class.

Social justice focuses on equality of opportunity, ensuring that all individuals have the same chances to succeed in life, regardless of their social or economic background. Economic justice, on the other hand, focuses on equality of outcome, aiming to reduce economic disparities and ensure that everyone has a decent standard of living.

Transitional justice is a theory of social justice that emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing historical injustices, particularly those committed during periods of conflict or oppression. It seeks to promote accountability, reconciliation, and healing, and to prevent future injustices from occurring.

Retributive justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes the importance of punishment as a way to deter crime and uphold the rule of law. Restorative justice, on the other hand, is a theory of justice that emphasizes the importance of rehabilitation and repairing the harm caused by crime, rather than simply punishing the offender.

Identity politics is a theory of social justice that emphasizes the importance of recognizing and valuing the contributions of marginalized groups, such as racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual minorities. It seeks to challenge dominant narratives and power structures that perpetuate inequality and to promote the rights and interests of marginalized communities.

Distributive justice focuses on the distribution of resources and benefits among individuals or groups, ensuring that they are allocated fairly and equitably. Procedural justice, on the other hand, focuses on the fairness of the process by which decisions are made and resources are allocated.