Deference to Agency Expertise

Description: This quiz tests your understanding of the concept of deference to agency expertise in the context of judicial review.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: administrative law judicial review deference to agency expertise
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the primary reason for courts to defer to agency expertise?

  1. Agencies have specialized knowledge and experience in their respective fields.

  2. Courts lack the expertise to make informed decisions on technical matters.

  3. Agencies are more efficient and expeditious in resolving disputes.

  4. Deference to agencies promotes consistency and uniformity in decision-making.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Courts defer to agency expertise primarily because agencies possess specialized knowledge and experience in their respective fields. This expertise enables agencies to make informed decisions on technical matters that may be beyond the understanding of courts.

Which of the following is NOT a factor that courts consider when determining the level of deference to give to an agency's decision?

  1. The agency's expertise in the relevant field

  2. The clarity and persuasiveness of the agency's reasoning

  3. The consistency of the agency's decision with past decisions

  4. The political views of the agency's decision-makers


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Courts do not consider the political views of the agency's decision-makers when determining the level of deference to give to an agency's decision. This is because the political views of the decision-makers are irrelevant to the merits of the agency's decision.

What is the highest level of deference that courts can give to an agency's decision?

  1. Arbitrary and capricious review

  2. Substantial evidence review

  3. Chevron deference

  4. Skidmore deference


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Chevron deference is the highest level of deference that courts can give to an agency's decision. Under Chevron deference, courts will uphold an agency's interpretation of a statute if it is reasonable, even if the court would have interpreted the statute differently.

What is the standard of review that courts apply when reviewing an agency's decision under the arbitrary and capricious standard?

  1. The agency's decision must be supported by substantial evidence.

  2. The agency's decision must be based on a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.

  3. The agency's decision must be in accordance with the law.

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Under the arbitrary and capricious standard of review, courts will uphold an agency's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence, is based on a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made, and is in accordance with the law.

Which of the following is an example of a case where a court applied Chevron deference to an agency's decision?

  1. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

  4. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., the Supreme Court held that courts must defer to an agency's interpretation of a statute if it is reasonable, even if the court would have interpreted the statute differently.

What is the purpose of the substantial evidence standard of review?

  1. To ensure that the agency's decision is supported by reliable and credible evidence.

  2. To prevent the agency from making arbitrary and capricious decisions.

  3. To ensure that the agency's decision is consistent with the law.

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The purpose of the substantial evidence standard of review is to ensure that the agency's decision is supported by reliable and credible evidence, to prevent the agency from making arbitrary and capricious decisions, and to ensure that the agency's decision is consistent with the law.

Which of the following is an example of a case where a court applied the substantial evidence standard of review to an agency's decision?

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB

  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

  3. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

In Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, the Supreme Court held that courts must uphold an agency's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence, even if the court would have reached a different conclusion on the evidence.

What is the purpose of the Skidmore deference standard of review?

  1. To give courts the flexibility to consider an agency's decision without being bound by it.

  2. To ensure that the agency's decision is supported by reliable and credible evidence.

  3. To prevent the agency from making arbitrary and capricious decisions.

  4. To ensure that the agency's decision is consistent with the law.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The purpose of the Skidmore deference standard of review is to give courts the flexibility to consider an agency's decision without being bound by it. This standard of review is typically applied to agency decisions that are not entitled to Chevron or substantial evidence deference.

Which of the following is an example of a case where a court applied the Skidmore deference standard of review to an agency's decision?

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.

  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB

  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

  4. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

In Skidmore v. Swift & Co., the Supreme Court held that courts may consider an agency's interpretation of a statute as persuasive authority, but are not bound by it.

What is the difference between Chevron deference and Skidmore deference?

  1. Chevron deference is a higher level of deference than Skidmore deference.

  2. Skidmore deference is a higher level of deference than Chevron deference.

  3. Chevron deference is applied to agency decisions that interpret statutes, while Skidmore deference is applied to agency decisions that interpret regulations.

  4. Chevron deference is applied to agency decisions that are made after a formal rulemaking proceeding, while Skidmore deference is applied to agency decisions that are made after an informal rulemaking proceeding.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Chevron deference is a higher level of deference than Skidmore deference. Under Chevron deference, courts must uphold an agency's interpretation of a statute if it is reasonable, even if the court would have interpreted the statute differently. Under Skidmore deference, courts may consider an agency's interpretation of a statute as persuasive authority, but are not bound by it.

Which of the following factors is NOT considered by courts when determining the level of deference to give to an agency's decision?

  1. The agency's expertise in the relevant field

  2. The clarity and persuasiveness of the agency's reasoning

  3. The consistency of the agency's decision with past decisions

  4. The political views of the agency's decision-makers


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Courts do not consider the political views of the agency's decision-makers when determining the level of deference to give to an agency's decision. This is because the political views of the decision-makers are irrelevant to the merits of the agency's decision.

What is the purpose of the arbitrary and capricious standard of review?

  1. To ensure that the agency's decision is supported by reliable and credible evidence.

  2. To prevent the agency from making arbitrary and capricious decisions.

  3. To ensure that the agency's decision is consistent with the law.

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The purpose of the arbitrary and capricious standard of review is to ensure that the agency's decision is supported by reliable and credible evidence, to prevent the agency from making arbitrary and capricious decisions, and to ensure that the agency's decision is consistent with the law.

Which of the following is an example of a case where a court applied the arbitrary and capricious standard of review to an agency's decision?

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

  3. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

  4. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

In Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., the Supreme Court held that courts must uphold an agency's decision if it is not arbitrary and capricious, even if the court would have reached a different conclusion on the evidence.

What is the difference between substantial evidence review and arbitrary and capricious review?

  1. Substantial evidence review is a higher level of deference than arbitrary and capricious review.

  2. Arbitrary and capricious review is a higher level of deference than substantial evidence review.

  3. Substantial evidence review is applied to agency decisions that interpret statutes, while arbitrary and capricious review is applied to agency decisions that interpret regulations.

  4. Substantial evidence review is applied to agency decisions that are made after a formal rulemaking proceeding, while arbitrary and capricious review is applied to agency decisions that are made after an informal rulemaking proceeding.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Arbitrary and capricious review is a higher level of deference than substantial evidence review. Under arbitrary and capricious review, courts will uphold an agency's decision if it is not arbitrary and capricious, even if the court would have reached a different conclusion on the evidence. Under substantial evidence review, courts will uphold an agency's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence, even if the court would have reached a different conclusion on the evidence.

- Hide questions