0

The Concept of Sadhya: Predicate of an Inference

Description: This quiz is designed to assess your understanding of the concept of Sadhya, which refers to the predicate or conclusion of an inference in Indian Philosophy, particularly in the Vaisheshika school of thought.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: indian philosophy vaisheshika philosophy sadhya inference
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the primary function of Sadhya in an inference?

  1. To establish the truth of the conclusion

  2. To provide evidence for the conclusion

  3. To negate the opposite of the conclusion

  4. To connect the premises with the conclusion


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Sadhya serves as the predicate or conclusion of an inference, and its primary purpose is to establish the truth or validity of the conclusion based on the evidence provided by the premises.

Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of Sadhya?

  1. It is the minor term of an inference

  2. It is the predicate of an inference

  3. It is always a universal proposition

  4. It is the result of the inferential process


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Sadhya is not necessarily a universal proposition. It can be a particular proposition or even a negative proposition, depending on the nature of the inference.

What is the relationship between Sadhya and Paksha in an inference?

  1. Sadhya is the subject of the inference, while Paksha is the predicate

  2. Sadhya is the predicate of the inference, while Paksha is the subject

  3. Sadhya is the minor term of the inference, while Paksha is the major term

  4. Sadhya is the major term of the inference, while Paksha is the minor term


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

In an inference, Sadhya is the predicate or conclusion, while Paksha is the subject or the entity about which something is being inferred.

How does Sadhya contribute to the validity of an inference?

  1. By providing sufficient evidence to support the conclusion

  2. By ensuring that the premises are logically connected to the conclusion

  3. By establishing a causal relationship between the premises and the conclusion

  4. By eliminating all possible objections to the conclusion


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Sadhya contributes to the validity of an inference by providing sufficient evidence or reasons to support the conclusion, making it logically acceptable and convincing.

What is the difference between Sadhya and Vyapti in an inference?

  1. Sadhya is the conclusion, while Vyapti is the evidence

  2. Sadhya is the predicate, while Vyapti is the subject

  3. Sadhya is the minor term, while Vyapti is the major term

  4. Sadhya is the major term, while Vyapti is the minor term


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Sadhya is the conclusion or predicate of an inference, while Vyapti is the evidence or the general rule that connects the premises with the conclusion.

Which of the following is an example of a Sadhya in an inference?

  1. The mountain has fire

  2. The mountain is smoky

  3. Wherever there is smoke, there is fire

  4. Fire is the cause of smoke


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The statement 'The mountain has fire' is an example of a Sadhya, as it is the conclusion or predicate of an inference based on the evidence of smoke on the mountain.

What is the role of Sadhya in the process of anumana (inference) according to Vaisheshika philosophy?

  1. It is the minor term of the inference

  2. It is the major term of the inference

  3. It is the middle term of the inference

  4. It is the conclusion of the inference


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

In Vaisheshika philosophy, Sadhya is considered to be the conclusion or predicate of an inference, which is established through the logical connection between the premises and the evidence provided.

How is the validity of a Sadhya determined in Vaisheshika philosophy?

  1. Through the presence of a hetu (reason) that supports the conclusion

  2. Through the absence of a hetu (reason) that contradicts the conclusion

  3. Through the presence of a drishtanta (example) that supports the conclusion

  4. Through the absence of a drishtanta (example) that contradicts the conclusion


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

In Vaisheshika philosophy, the validity of a Sadhya is determined primarily through the presence of a hetu (reason) that logically supports and establishes the conclusion.

What is the relationship between Sadhya and Paksha in an inference?

  1. Sadhya is the subject of the inference, while Paksha is the predicate

  2. Sadhya is the predicate of the inference, while Paksha is the subject

  3. Sadhya is the minor term of the inference, while Paksha is the major term

  4. Sadhya is the major term of the inference, while Paksha is the minor term


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

In an inference, Sadhya is the predicate or conclusion, while Paksha is the subject or the entity about which something is being inferred.

How does Sadhya contribute to the validity of an inference?

  1. By providing sufficient evidence to support the conclusion

  2. By ensuring that the premises are logically connected to the conclusion

  3. By establishing a causal relationship between the premises and the conclusion

  4. By eliminating all possible objections to the conclusion


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Sadhya contributes to the validity of an inference by providing sufficient evidence or reasons to support the conclusion, making it logically acceptable and convincing.

What is the difference between Sadhya and Vyapti in an inference?

  1. Sadhya is the conclusion, while Vyapti is the evidence

  2. Sadhya is the predicate, while Vyapti is the subject

  3. Sadhya is the minor term, while Vyapti is the major term

  4. Sadhya is the major term, while Vyapti is the minor term


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Sadhya is the conclusion or predicate of an inference, while Vyapti is the evidence or the general rule that connects the premises with the conclusion.

Which of the following is an example of a Sadhya in an inference?

  1. The mountain has fire

  2. The mountain is smoky

  3. Wherever there is smoke, there is fire

  4. Fire is the cause of smoke


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The statement 'The mountain has fire' is an example of a Sadhya, as it is the conclusion or predicate of an inference based on the evidence of smoke on the mountain.

What is the role of Sadhya in the process of anumana (inference) according to Vaisheshika philosophy?

  1. It is the minor term of the inference

  2. It is the major term of the inference

  3. It is the middle term of the inference

  4. It is the conclusion of the inference


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

In Vaisheshika philosophy, Sadhya is considered to be the conclusion or predicate of an inference, which is established through the logical connection between the premises and the evidence provided.

How is the validity of a Sadhya determined in Vaisheshika philosophy?

  1. Through the presence of a hetu (reason) that supports the conclusion

  2. Through the absence of a hetu (reason) that contradicts the conclusion

  3. Through the presence of a drishtanta (example) that supports the conclusion

  4. Through the absence of a drishtanta (example) that contradicts the conclusion


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

In Vaisheshika philosophy, the validity of a Sadhya is determined primarily through the presence of a hetu (reason) that logically supports and establishes the conclusion.

- Hide questions