The Parol Evidence Rule is a rule of evidence that prevents the introduction of extrinsic evidence, such as oral statements or prior agreements, to vary or contradict the terms of a written contract.

Parol evidence is generally admissible only if it is offered to explain or clarify the terms of the contract, and not to vary or contradict them.

The four exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule are fraud, mistake, duress, and undue influence.

The parol evidence rule does not make oral agreements void, but it does make them unenforceable unless they are supported by consideration.

A parol evidence rule is a rule of evidence that prevents the introduction of extrinsic evidence to vary or contradict the terms of a written contract. A merger clause is a contractual provision that states that the written contract is the complete and final agreement between the parties. A parol evidence rule applies to all contracts, while a merger clause applies only to written contracts.

The best way to avoid parol evidence disputes is to have all agreements in writing, make sure that the written agreement is clear and unambiguous, and have the agreement reviewed by an attorney before signing it.

Impossibility is not an exception to the parol evidence rule.

The parol evidence rule is a rule of evidence that prevents the introduction of extrinsic evidence, such as oral statements or prior agreements, to vary or contradict the terms of a written contract. The purpose of the parol evidence rule is to promote certainty and predictability in contracts by ensuring that the written contract is the final and complete expression of the parties' agreement.

The general rule regarding the admissibility of parol evidence is that parol evidence is admissible only if it is offered to explain or clarify the terms of the contract. This means that parol evidence cannot be used to vary or contradict the terms of a written contract.

The four exceptions to the parol evidence rule are fraud, mistake, duress, and undue influence. These exceptions allow parol evidence to be admitted to show that the contract was not validly formed or that it should be rescinded.

The parol evidence rule does not make oral agreements void, but it does make them unenforceable unless they are supported by consideration. This means that if an oral agreement is not supported by consideration, it cannot be enforced in court.

A parol evidence rule is a rule of evidence that prevents the introduction of extrinsic evidence to vary or contradict the terms of a written contract. A merger clause is a contractual provision that states that the written contract is the complete and final agreement between the parties. A parol evidence rule applies to all contracts, while a merger clause applies only to written contracts.

The best way to avoid parol evidence disputes is to have all agreements in writing, make sure that the written agreement is clear and unambiguous, and have the agreement reviewed by an attorney before signing it.

Impossibility is not an exception to the parol evidence rule.