Libel and Slander

Description: Libel and Slander Quiz
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: torts libel slander defamation
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the main difference between libel and slander?

  1. Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation.

  2. Libel is more serious than slander.

  3. Libel requires special damages, while slander does not.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation. Libel is generally considered more serious than slander, as it is more permanent and can reach a wider audience. Additionally, libel requires special damages, which means that the plaintiff must prove that they suffered actual harm as a result of the defamatory statement.

What are the four elements of a libel or slander claim?

  1. Publication, falsity, malice, and damages.

  2. Publication, falsity, intent, and damages.

  3. Publication, falsity, negligence, and damages.

  4. Publication, falsity, strict liability, and damages.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The four elements of a libel or slander claim are publication, falsity, malice, and damages. Publication means that the defamatory statement was communicated to a third person. Falsity means that the statement was false. Malice means that the statement was made with the intent to harm the plaintiff's reputation. Damages means that the plaintiff suffered harm as a result of the defamatory statement.

What is the difference between actual malice and implied malice?

  1. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.

  2. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant intended to harm the plaintiff's reputation, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.

  3. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with negligence, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.

  4. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with strict liability, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. Implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself, such as when the statement is defamatory per se.

What are some defenses to a libel or slander claim?

  1. Truth, privilege, consent, and fair comment.

  2. Truth, privilege, mistake, and fair comment.

  3. Truth, privilege, negligence, and fair comment.

  4. Truth, privilege, strict liability, and fair comment.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Some defenses to a libel or slander claim include truth, privilege, consent, and fair comment. Truth is a complete defense to a defamation claim. Privilege is a defense that protects certain communications from liability, such as statements made in a judicial proceeding or in the course of a legislative debate. Consent is a defense that arises when the plaintiff has consented to the publication of the defamatory statement. Fair comment is a defense that allows a defendant to express their opinion on a matter of public interest, even if the opinion is defamatory.

What are some examples of statements that are considered defamatory per se?

  1. Statements that accuse someone of a crime, a loathsome disease, or unchastity.

  2. Statements that accuse someone of being a liar, a cheat, or a fraud.

  3. Statements that accuse someone of being incompetent or unqualified in their profession.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Statements that are considered defamatory per se include statements that accuse someone of a crime, a loathsome disease, or unchastity. They also include statements that accuse someone of being a liar, a cheat, or a fraud. Additionally, statements that accuse someone of being incompetent or unqualified in their profession are also considered defamatory per se.

What is the statute of limitations for a libel or slander claim?

  1. One year.

  2. Two years.

  3. Three years.

  4. Four years.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The statute of limitations for a libel or slander claim is one year in most jurisdictions.

What are some of the remedies available to a plaintiff who has been defamed?

  1. Damages, injunction, and retraction.

  2. Damages, specific performance, and rescission.

  3. Damages, restitution, and disgorgement.

  4. Damages, reformation, and cancellation.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Some of the remedies available to a plaintiff who has been defamed include damages, injunction, and retraction. Damages are a monetary award that compensates the plaintiff for the harm they have suffered as a result of the defamation. An injunction is a court order that prevents the defendant from continuing to publish the defamatory statement. A retraction is a statement that the defendant publishes to correct the defamatory statement.

What is the difference between a libel suit and a slander suit?

  1. A libel suit is based on written defamation, while a slander suit is based on spoken defamation.

  2. A libel suit requires the plaintiff to prove special damages, while a slander suit does not.

  3. A libel suit is more likely to be successful than a slander suit.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

A libel suit is based on written defamation, while a slander suit is based on spoken defamation. Libel is generally considered more serious than slander, as it is more permanent and can reach a wider audience. Additionally, libel requires the plaintiff to prove special damages, which means that the plaintiff must prove that they suffered actual harm as a result of the defamatory statement.

What are the defenses to a libel or slander suit?

  1. Truth, privilege, fair comment, and consent.

  2. Truth, privilege, mistake, and consent.

  3. Truth, privilege, negligence, and consent.

  4. Truth, privilege, strict liability, and consent.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The defenses to a libel or slander suit include truth, privilege, fair comment, and consent. Truth is a complete defense to a defamation claim. Privilege is a defense that protects certain communications from liability, such as statements made in a judicial proceeding or in the course of a legislative debate. Fair comment is a defense that allows a defendant to express their opinion on a matter of public interest, even if the opinion is defamatory. Consent is a defense that arises when the plaintiff has consented to the publication of the defamatory statement.

What are the damages that can be awarded in a libel or slander suit?

  1. Compensatory damages, punitive damages, and nominal damages.

  2. Compensatory damages, specific performance, and rescission.

  3. Compensatory damages, restitution, and disgorgement.

  4. Compensatory damages, reformation, and cancellation.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The damages that can be awarded in a libel or slander suit include compensatory damages, punitive damages, and nominal damages. Compensatory damages are a monetary award that compensates the plaintiff for the harm they have suffered as a result of the defamation. Punitive damages are a monetary award that is intended to punish the defendant for their conduct. Nominal damages are a small monetary award that is awarded to the plaintiff even if they have not suffered any actual harm.

What is the statute of limitations for a libel or slander suit?

  1. One year.

  2. Two years.

  3. Three years.

  4. Four years.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The statute of limitations for a libel or slander suit is one year in most jurisdictions.

What are some examples of statements that are considered defamatory per se?

  1. Statements that accuse someone of a crime, a loathsome disease, or unchastity.

  2. Statements that accuse someone of being a liar, a cheat, or a fraud.

  3. Statements that accuse someone of being incompetent or unqualified in their profession.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Statements that are considered defamatory per se include statements that accuse someone of a crime, a loathsome disease, or unchastity. They also include statements that accuse someone of being a liar, a cheat, or a fraud. Additionally, statements that accuse someone of being incompetent or unqualified in their profession are also considered defamatory per se.

What is the difference between libel and slander?

  1. Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation.

  2. Libel is more serious than slander.

  3. Libel requires special damages, while slander does not.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation. Libel is generally considered more serious than slander, as it is more permanent and can reach a wider audience. Additionally, libel requires the plaintiff to prove special damages, which means that the plaintiff must prove that they suffered actual harm as a result of the defamatory statement.

What are the four elements of a libel or slander claim?

  1. Publication, falsity, malice, and damages.

  2. Publication, falsity, intent, and damages.

  3. Publication, falsity, negligence, and damages.

  4. Publication, falsity, strict liability, and damages.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The four elements of a libel or slander claim are publication, falsity, malice, and damages. Publication means that the defamatory statement was communicated to a third person. Falsity means that the statement was false. Malice means that the statement was made with the intent to harm the plaintiff's reputation. Damages means that the plaintiff suffered harm as a result of the defamatory statement.

What is the difference between actual malice and implied malice?

  1. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.

  2. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant intended to harm the plaintiff's reputation, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.

  3. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with negligence, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.

  4. Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant acted with strict liability, while implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Actual malice requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity. Implied malice is presumed from the nature of the statement itself, such as when the statement is defamatory per se.

- Hide questions