Robert Michels coined the term "iron law of oligarchy" in his 1911 book Political Parties. The iron law of oligarchy states that all organizations, regardless of their size or purpose, will eventually be ruled by a small group of people.

Vilfredo Pareto argued that power in society is naturally distributed among a small group of people, which he called the power elite. The power elite is composed of those who hold the most wealth, power, and influence in society.

Elitism has been criticized for being undemocratic, inefficient, and corrupt. Critics argue that elitism is undemocratic because it gives power to a small group of people who are not accountable to the rest of society. They also argue that elitism is inefficient because it prevents talented people from rising to the top. Finally, critics argue that elitism is corrupt because it allows the power elite to use their power for their own personal gain.

Elitism is a political system in which a small group of people hold power. Monarchies, aristocracies, and dictatorships are all examples of elitism because they are all ruled by a small group of people.

Elitism is a belief that power should be held by a small group of people who are considered to be the best and brightest. Pluralism is a belief that power should be shared among many people, regardless of their qualifications or social status. The main difference between elitism and pluralism is that elitism believes that power should be held by a small group of people who are considered to be the best and brightest, while pluralism believes that power should be shared among many people, regardless of their qualifications or social status.

A meritocracy is a society in which power is held by those who are most qualified to lead. This means that people are chosen for positions of power based on their skills, abilities, and knowledge, rather than their social status, wealth, or popularity.

Proponents of elitism argue that it is more efficient, just, and stable than other forms of government. They argue that elitism is more efficient because it allows decisions to be made quickly and decisively by a small group of people who are experts in their field. They also argue that elitism is more just because it ensures that the most qualified people are in positions of power. Finally, they argue that elitism is more stable because it prevents the rise of demagogues and dictators.

Critics of elitism argue that it is undemocratic, inefficient, and corrupt. They argue that elitism is undemocratic because it gives power to a small group of people who are not accountable to the rest of society. They also argue that elitism is inefficient because it prevents talented people from rising to the top. Finally, they argue that elitism is corrupt because it allows the power elite to use their power for their own personal gain.

Elitism is a political system in which a small group of people hold power. The power elite is not accountable to the rest of society, which is one of the main criticisms of elitism.

The United States, China, and Russia are all examples of elitist societies. In the United States, power is held by a small group of wealthy and powerful people. In China, power is held by the Communist Party. In Russia, power is held by President Vladimir Putin and his inner circle.

Intellectual elitism is not a type of elitism. Political elitism, economic elitism, and cultural elitism are all types of elitism that are based on different factors, such as wealth, power, or social status.

Elitism has been criticized for being undemocratic, inefficient, and corrupt. Critics argue that elitism is undemocratic because it gives power to a small group of people who are not accountable to the rest of society. They also argue that elitism is inefficient because it prevents talented people from rising to the top. Finally, they argue that elitism is corrupt because it allows the power elite to use their power for their own personal gain.

Proponents of elitism argue that it is more efficient, just, and stable than other forms of government. They argue that elitism is more efficient because it allows decisions to be made quickly and decisively by a small group of people who are experts in their field. They also argue that elitism is more just because it ensures that the most qualified people are in positions of power. Finally, they argue that elitism is more stable because it prevents the rise of demagogues and dictators.

The Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations are all examples of elitist organizations. These organizations are composed of a small group of wealthy and powerful people who meet regularly to discuss global issues.

Economic elitism is a type of elitism that is based on wealth. Economic elites are those who have a disproportionate amount of wealth and power in society.