To ensure that agencies act within the scope of their authority

To assess the economic efficiency of agency decisions

To evaluate the social welfare impact of agency decisions

To determine the political feasibility of agency decisions

Arbitrary and capricious standard

Substantial evidence standard

De novo review standard

Clear and convincing evidence standard

Whether the agency considered all relevant evidence

Whether the agency's decision was supported by substantial evidence

Whether the agency followed proper procedures

All of the above

To assess the economic efficiency of agency decisions

To evaluate the social welfare impact of agency decisions

To determine the political feasibility of agency decisions

To ensure that agencies act within the scope of their authority

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

It requires courts to defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes

It allows courts to overturn agency decisions that are not supported by substantial evidence

It limits the scope of judicial review to procedural issues

It prohibits courts from considering economic and social welfare factors in their review

Courts can overturn agency interpretations that are arbitrary and capricious

Courts can overturn agency interpretations that are not supported by substantial evidence

Courts can overturn agency interpretations that violate constitutional rights

All of the above

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

To assess the economic efficiency of agency decisions

To evaluate the social welfare impact of agency decisions

To determine the political feasibility of agency decisions

To ensure that agencies act within the scope of their authority

Cost-benefit analysis is often subjective and difficult to quantify

Cost-benefit analysis may not account for all relevant factors, such as environmental or social impacts

Cost-benefit analysis may be biased towards certain groups or interests

All of the above

To ensure that agencies take into account the impact of their decisions on different groups of people

To prevent agencies from making decisions that benefit one group at the expense of another

To promote economic efficiency and social welfare

All of the above

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

Massachusetts v. EPA

Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc.

To ensure that agencies follow proper procedures in making their decisions

To prevent agencies from abusing their power

To promote transparency and accountability in agency decision-making

All of the above

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe

Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc.

The complexity and technical nature of the issues involved

The deference courts must give to agency expertise

The limited resources available to courts for conducting review

All of the above