The ethical concern surrounding human cloning primarily centers on the violation of human dignity and autonomy, as it raises questions about the rights, identity, and individuality of cloned individuals.

The principle of autonomy is most relevant to the debate on cloning, as it addresses the right of individuals to make decisions about their own bodies and lives, including the choice to be cloned or not.

The main argument against cloning humans for organ donation is that it violates the rights of the cloned individual, as they would be created solely for the purpose of providing organs, raising concerns about exploitation and lack of autonomy.

The prospect of cloning animals for food production raises ethical concerns related to the potential for animal suffering, the impact on biodiversity, and the safety of cloned meat for human consumption.

The primary concern regarding the potential use of cloning for reproductive purposes is the potential for creating designer babies, where parents could select specific traits or characteristics for their children, raising ethical questions about eugenics and social inequality.

The principle of non-maleficence is violated when cloned animals are used for research without proper consideration for their welfare, as it requires researchers to avoid causing harm or suffering to the animals involved.

The main ethical argument in favor of therapeutic cloning is that it has the potential to cure diseases and save lives, as it allows for the creation of patient-specific stem cells that can be used to treat a wide range of medical conditions.

The prospect of cloning extinct species raises ethical concerns related to the potential for ecological disruption, the violation of natural evolutionary processes, and the cost and feasibility of such projects.

The primary ethical consideration when cloning animals for conservation purposes is the potential impact on genetic diversity, as cloning can reduce genetic variation and limit the adaptability of populations.

The principle of non-maleficence is violated when cloned animals are treated as mere commodities rather than sentient beings, as it requires researchers and handlers to avoid causing harm or suffering to the animals involved.

The potential use of cloning to create hybrid animals raises ethical concerns related to the potential for ecological disruption, the violation of natural evolutionary processes, and the potential for creating new diseases.

The principle of non-maleficence is violated when cloned animals are used for entertainment purposes without proper consideration for their welfare, as it requires researchers and handlers to avoid causing harm or suffering to the animals involved.

The potential use of cloning to create genetically modified animals raises ethical concerns related to the potential for unintended consequences on ecosystems, the violation of natural evolutionary processes, and the potential for creating new diseases.

The principle of non-maleficence is violated when cloned animals are used for military purposes without proper consideration for their welfare, as it requires researchers and handlers to avoid causing harm or suffering to the animals involved.

The potential use of cloning to create chimeras raises ethical concerns related to the potential for creating new diseases, the violation of natural evolutionary processes, and the potential for creating animals with unpredictable behavior.