A doctrine that requires a party to exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking judicial review.

A doctrine that requires a court to determine whether a case is ready for judicial review.

A doctrine that requires a court to consider the impact of its decision on other parties.

A doctrine that requires a court to consider the potential for harm to the public interest.

A doctrine that requires a party to exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking judicial review.

A doctrine that requires a court to determine whether a case is ready for judicial review.

A doctrine that requires a court to consider the impact of its decision on other parties.

A doctrine that requires a court to consider the potential for harm to the public interest.

When the administrative agency has acted illegally.

When the administrative agency has acted unconstitutionally.

When the administrative agency has acted arbitrarily or capriciously.

All of the above.

To prevent courts from interfering with the administrative process.

To ensure that the issues in a case are sufficiently developed before judicial review.

To give the administrative agency an opportunity to correct its own errors.

All of the above.

To prevent courts from interfering with the administrative process.

To ensure that the issues in a case are sufficiently developed before judicial review.

To give the administrative agency an opportunity to correct its own errors.

All of the above.

The finality of the administrative agency's decision.

The impact of the agency's decision on the parties.

The potential for harm to the public interest.

All of the above.

The adequacy of the administrative agency's procedures.

The availability of judicial review of the agency's decision.

The potential for harm to the parties if they are required to exhaust their administrative remedies.

All of the above.

When the administrative agency has acted illegally.

When the administrative agency has acted unconstitutionally.

When the administrative agency has acted arbitrarily or capriciously.

All of the above.

Ripeness is a procedural requirement, while exhaustion of administrative remedies is a substantive requirement.

Ripeness is a question of law, while exhaustion of administrative remedies is a question of fact.

Ripeness is determined by the court, while exhaustion of administrative remedies is determined by the administrative agency.

All of the above.

A court may dismiss a case that is not ripe for judicial review.

A court may dismiss a case where the plaintiff has failed to exhaust their administrative remedies.

Both of the above.

None of the above.

It can delay judicial review of important issues.

It can give the administrative agency too much power.

It can be difficult to apply in practice.

All of the above.

It can delay judicial review of important issues.

It can give the administrative agency too much power.

It can be difficult to apply in practice.

All of the above.

The doctrines have become more flexible over time.

The doctrines have become more rigid over time.

The doctrines have remained largely unchanged over time.

None of the above.

Courts are more likely to find that cases are ripe for judicial review.

Courts are more likely to require exhaustion of administrative remedies.

Courts are more likely to balance the competing interests of the parties when deciding whether to require exhaustion of administrative remedies.

All of the above.

The doctrines will continue to evolve as the courts adapt them to new challenges.

The doctrines will eventually be replaced by a more streamlined system of judicial review.

The doctrines will remain largely unchanged for the foreseeable future.

None of the above.