To resolve disputes between parties from different countries

To promote international trade and commerce

To enhance cultural understanding between nations

To strengthen diplomatic relations between countries

Arbitration

Mediation

Conciliation

Negotiation

To act as a judge and decide the outcome of the dispute

To facilitate negotiations between the parties

To provide expert advice to the parties

To draft a settlement agreement

To act as a judge and decide the outcome of the dispute

To facilitate negotiations between the parties

To provide expert advice to the parties

To draft a settlement agreement

To act as a judge and decide the outcome of the dispute

To facilitate negotiations between the parties

To provide expert advice to the parties

To draft a settlement agreement

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)

The American Arbitration Association (AAA)

The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)

A treaty that governs the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards

A set of rules that govern the conduct of international arbitration

A body of law that governs the resolution of international disputes

A code of ethics for international arbitrators

A treaty that governs the settlement of investment disputes between investors and states

A set of rules that govern the conduct of international arbitration

A body of law that governs the resolution of international disputes

A code of ethics for international arbitrators

A set of rules that govern the conduct of international arbitration

A body of law that governs the resolution of international disputes

A code of ethics for international arbitrators

A treaty that governs the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards

In arbitration, the parties present their case to a neutral third party who makes a binding decision, while in mediation, the parties work with a neutral third party to reach a mutually acceptable settlement.

In arbitration, the parties present their case to a neutral third party who makes a non-binding recommendation, while in mediation, the parties work with a neutral third party to reach a mutually acceptable settlement.

In arbitration, the parties present their case to a neutral third party who makes a binding decision, while in mediation, the parties work with a neutral third party to reach a non-binding settlement.

In arbitration, the parties present their case to a neutral third party who makes a non-binding recommendation, while in mediation, the parties work with a neutral third party to reach a binding settlement.

It is faster and more cost-effective than litigation.

It is more flexible and adaptable to the needs of the parties.

It is more confidential than litigation.

All of the above.

It can be difficult to enforce ADR awards in some countries.

The parties may not have access to qualified ADR practitioners.

The ADR process may be too complex or time-consuming for some parties.

All of the above.

The lack of a uniform legal framework for International ADR.

The cultural differences between parties from different countries.

The language barriers between parties from different countries.

All of the above.

International ADR is likely to become more popular in the future.

International ADR is likely to become less popular in the future.

The future of International ADR is uncertain.

None of the above.