The Problem of Miracles

Description: This quiz focuses on the philosophical problem of miracles, exploring the concept of miracles, their relation to natural laws, and the challenges they pose to religious beliefs and scientific understanding.
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: philosophy of religion the problem of miracles natural laws religious beliefs scientific understanding
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the central concern of the problem of miracles?

  1. The existence of miracles as supernatural events.

  2. The compatibility of miracles with natural laws.

  3. The role of miracles in religious beliefs.

  4. The impact of miracles on scientific understanding.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The problem of miracles primarily revolves around the question of whether miracles, as supernatural events, can coexist with the established laws of nature and the principles of scientific understanding.

According to David Hume, what is the primary objection to miracles?

  1. Miracles violate the laws of nature.

  2. Miracles are unsupported by empirical evidence.

  3. Miracles are contradictory to human experience.

  4. Miracles undermine the authority of religious texts.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Hume's primary objection to miracles is that they violate the established laws of nature, which are based on consistent and uniform observations of the natural world.

What is the evidentialist approach to the problem of miracles?

  1. Miracles can be proven through empirical evidence.

  2. Miracles can be inferred from historical accounts.

  3. Miracles can be supported by logical arguments.

  4. Miracles can be experienced through personal faith.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The evidentialist approach seeks to establish the existence of miracles through empirical evidence, such as eyewitness accounts, historical records, or scientific investigations.

What is the fideist approach to the problem of miracles?

  1. Miracles are accepted on the basis of faith alone.

  2. Miracles are supported by rational arguments.

  3. Miracles can be proven through empirical evidence.

  4. Miracles are incompatible with scientific understanding.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The fideist approach emphasizes that miracles are accepted as true solely on the basis of faith, without relying on empirical evidence or rational arguments.

What is the naturalist approach to the problem of miracles?

  1. Miracles are supernatural events that violate natural laws.

  2. Miracles are rare and exceptional occurrences within natural laws.

  3. Miracles are products of human imagination and superstition.

  4. Miracles are scientifically inexplicable phenomena.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The naturalist approach generally dismisses miracles as products of human imagination, superstition, or misinterpretations of natural phenomena.

What is the significance of the problem of miracles for religious beliefs?

  1. It challenges the authority of religious texts.

  2. It undermines the concept of divine intervention.

  3. It raises questions about the existence of God.

  4. It conflicts with the teachings of religious leaders.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The problem of miracles poses a challenge to the authority of religious texts, as it questions the reliability of miraculous accounts and their role in supporting religious beliefs.

What is the significance of the problem of miracles for scientific understanding?

  1. It undermines the principles of scientific inquiry.

  2. It challenges the laws of nature and causality.

  3. It conflicts with the methods of scientific investigation.

  4. It raises questions about the limits of human knowledge.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The problem of miracles challenges the fundamental principles of scientific inquiry, particularly the laws of nature and the concept of causality, which are essential for understanding and explaining natural phenomena.

What is the ontological argument for the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles are necessary for the existence of God.

  2. Miracles are evidence of God's power and intervention.

  3. Miracles are the result of divine laws and purposes.

  4. Miracles are manifestations of the supernatural realm.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The ontological argument for the existence of miracles suggests that miracles are evidence of God's power and intervention in the natural world, demonstrating God's ability to act beyond the ordinary course of events.

What is the cosmological argument for the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles are necessary for the creation of the universe.

  2. Miracles are evidence of a purposeful and intelligent design.

  3. Miracles are the result of divine laws and purposes.

  4. Miracles are manifestations of the supernatural realm.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The cosmological argument for the existence of miracles suggests that miracles are evidence of a purposeful and intelligent design in the universe, pointing to the existence of a divine creator.

What is the teleological argument for the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles are necessary for the fulfillment of divine purposes.

  2. Miracles are evidence of God's plan and providence.

  3. Miracles are the result of divine laws and purposes.

  4. Miracles are manifestations of the supernatural realm.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The teleological argument for the existence of miracles suggests that miracles are evidence of God's plan and providence, demonstrating God's involvement in the world and the fulfillment of divine purposes.

What is the moral argument for the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles are necessary for moral guidance and instruction.

  2. Miracles are evidence of God's love and compassion.

  3. Miracles are the result of divine laws and purposes.

  4. Miracles are manifestations of the supernatural realm.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The moral argument for the existence of miracles suggests that miracles are evidence of God's love and compassion, demonstrating God's desire to intervene in human affairs and provide guidance and support.

What is the experiential argument for the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles are experienced through personal faith and devotion.

  2. Miracles are supported by historical accounts and records.

  3. Miracles are the result of divine laws and purposes.

  4. Miracles are manifestations of the supernatural realm.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The experiential argument for the existence of miracles emphasizes that miracles are experienced through personal faith and devotion, suggesting that individuals can have direct encounters with the supernatural and witness miraculous events.

What is the skeptical argument against the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles violate the laws of nature and are therefore impossible.

  2. Miracles are unsupported by empirical evidence and are therefore unreliable.

  3. Miracles are products of human imagination and superstition.

  4. Miracles conflict with the principles of scientific inquiry.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The skeptical argument against the existence of miracles asserts that miracles violate the established laws of nature and are therefore impossible, as they contradict the fundamental principles of the natural world.

What is the naturalistic argument against the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles are products of natural causes and processes.

  2. Miracles are misinterpretations of natural phenomena.

  3. Miracles are the result of psychological factors and beliefs.

  4. Miracles are unsupported by scientific evidence.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The naturalistic argument against the existence of miracles suggests that miracles are products of natural causes and processes, such as rare coincidences, misinterpretations, or psychological phenomena, rather than supernatural interventions.

What is the historical argument against the existence of miracles?

  1. Miracles are not supported by reliable historical evidence.

  2. Miracles are often exaggerated or embellished over time.

  3. Miracles are subject to bias and interpretation.

  4. Miracles conflict with the principles of historical inquiry.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The historical argument against the existence of miracles asserts that miracles are not supported by reliable historical evidence, as many accounts of miracles are based on hearsay, unreliable sources, or biased interpretations.

- Hide questions