Judicial review is a process by which the courts can review the actions of the executive branch of government to ensure that they are acting within their legal authority.

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is the highest court in the United Kingdom and has the ultimate authority for judicial review.

The grounds for judicial review in the United Kingdom include illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety.

The remedy for a successful judicial review challenge in the United Kingdom can include a declaration that the government action is unlawful, an injunction to stop the government action, and damages for any losses suffered as a result of the government action.

Judicial review in the United Kingdom helps to protect individual rights and freedoms, ensures that the government is accountable for its actions, and promotes the rule of law.

Equity is not a ground for judicial review in the United Kingdom.

Ultra vires is the legal principle that allows the courts to review the decisions of administrative tribunals.

Damages are not a type of judicial review remedy.

Procedural fairness is the legal principle that requires public authorities to act fairly and reasonably.

Mootness is not a type of judicial review ground.

Certiorari is the legal principle that allows the courts to review the decisions of lower courts.

Mandatory order is not a type of judicial review remedy.

Transparency is the legal principle that requires public authorities to give reasons for their decisions.

Lack of jurisdiction is not a type of judicial review ground.

Judicial review is the legal principle that allows the courts to review the decisions of government ministers.