Thomas Aquinas argued that the existence of God is a necessary truth because it is self-evident. He believed that the idea of a perfect being is so clear and distinct that it must exist.

The problem of evil is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that the existence of evil in the world is incompatible with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

The ontological argument for the existence of God is a philosophical argument that attempts to prove the existence of God from the concept of God itself. It was first proposed by Anselm of Canterbury in the 11th century.

The cosmological argument for the existence of God is a philosophical argument that attempts to prove the existence of God from the existence of the universe. It was first proposed by Aristotle in the 4th century BC.

The teleological argument for the existence of God is a philosophical argument that attempts to prove the existence of God from the order and purpose of the universe. It was first proposed by William Paley in the 18th century.

The moral argument for the existence of God is a philosophical argument that attempts to prove the existence of God from the existence of moral values. It was first proposed by Immanuel Kant in the 18th century.

The existential argument for the existence of God is a philosophical argument that attempts to prove the existence of God from the fact that we exist. It was first proposed by Søren Kierkegaard in the 19th century.

The problem of hiddenness is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be more evident to us. The fact that he is hidden from us suggests that he does not exist.

The problem of divine hiddenness is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be more evident to us. The fact that he is hidden from us suggests that he does not exist.

The problem of divine suffering is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be perfect and therefore incapable of suffering. The fact that he suffers suggests that he is not perfect and therefore does not exist.

The problem of divine injustice is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be just and therefore would not allow innocent people to suffer. The fact that innocent people do suffer suggests that God is not just and therefore does not exist.

The problem of divine omnipotence is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be omnipotent and therefore would be able to prevent all evil. The fact that evil exists suggests that God is not omnipotent and therefore does not exist.

The problem of divine omniscience is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be omniscient and therefore would know everything. The fact that he does not know everything suggests that he is not omniscient and therefore does not exist.

The problem of divine benevolence is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be benevolent and therefore would not allow innocent people to suffer. The fact that innocent people do suffer suggests that God is not benevolent and therefore does not exist.

The problem of divine simplicity is a philosophical argument against the existence of God. It states that if God exists, he would be simple and therefore would not have any parts. The fact that he has parts suggests that he is not simple and therefore does not exist.