Directed Verdict

Description: This quiz covers the legal concept of directed verdict, which is a type of motion made by a party in a civil or criminal trial asking the judge to decide the case in their favor without letting the jury deliberate.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: directed verdict trial law civil procedure criminal procedure
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the purpose of a directed verdict?

  1. To allow the judge to decide the case without letting the jury deliberate

  2. To allow the jury to decide the case without hearing any evidence

  3. To allow the parties to settle the case without going to trial

  4. To allow the judge to dismiss the case without a trial


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

A directed verdict is a motion made by a party in a civil or criminal trial asking the judge to decide the case in their favor without letting the jury deliberate. This is typically done when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

When can a party move for a directed verdict?

  1. At the close of the plaintiff's case

  2. At the close of the defendant's case

  3. At any time during the trial

  4. After the jury has reached a verdict


Correct Option:
Explanation:

A party can move for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff's case or at the close of the defendant's case. The motion must be made before the jury begins deliberations.

What is the standard for granting a directed verdict?

  1. There is no genuine dispute as to any material fact

  2. The moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law

  3. Both A and B

  4. Neither A nor B


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The standard for granting a directed verdict is that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

What happens if a directed verdict is granted?

  1. The judge enters a judgment in favor of the moving party

  2. The jury is instructed to return a verdict in favor of the moving party

  3. The case is dismissed

  4. The trial continues as if no motion had been made


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

If a directed verdict is granted, the judge enters a judgment in favor of the moving party. This means that the moving party wins the case without the jury having to deliberate.

Can a directed verdict be appealed?

  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. It depends on the jurisdiction

  4. It depends on the circumstances of the case


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

A directed verdict can be appealed. The party who lost the case can appeal the decision to a higher court.

What are some of the common grounds for a directed verdict?

  1. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted

  2. Lack of evidence to support a claim or defense

  3. Insufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute as to a material fact

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the common grounds for a directed verdict include failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, lack of evidence to support a claim or defense, and insufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute as to a material fact.

What are some of the factors that a judge will consider when deciding whether to grant a directed verdict?

  1. The strength of the evidence

  2. The credibility of the witnesses

  3. The applicable law

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

When deciding whether to grant a directed verdict, a judge will consider the strength of the evidence, the credibility of the witnesses, the applicable law, and any other relevant factors.

What are some of the advantages of a directed verdict?

  1. It can save time and money

  2. It can prevent a jury from reaching an incorrect verdict

  3. It can ensure that justice is served

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the advantages of a directed verdict include that it can save time and money, it can prevent a jury from reaching an incorrect verdict, and it can ensure that justice is served.

What are some of the disadvantages of a directed verdict?

  1. It can deprive the jury of its right to decide the case

  2. It can lead to an incorrect verdict

  3. It can be difficult to obtain

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the disadvantages of a directed verdict include that it can deprive the jury of its right to decide the case, it can lead to an incorrect verdict, and it can be difficult to obtain.

In which of the following cases would a directed verdict be appropriate?

  1. A case where there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact

  2. A case where the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law

  3. A case where the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of one party

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

A directed verdict would be appropriate in a case where there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, where the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, or where the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of one party.

In which of the following cases would a directed verdict NOT be appropriate?

  1. A case where there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact

  2. A case where the moving party is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law

  3. A case where the evidence is evenly balanced

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

A directed verdict would not be appropriate in a case where there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact, where the moving party is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, or where the evidence is evenly balanced.

What is the difference between a directed verdict and a summary judgment?

  1. A directed verdict is granted at trial, while a summary judgment is granted before trial

  2. A directed verdict is granted by the judge, while a summary judgment is granted by the jury

  3. A directed verdict is granted when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, while a summary judgment is granted when there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The main difference between a directed verdict and a summary judgment is that a directed verdict is granted at trial, while a summary judgment is granted before trial.

What is the difference between a directed verdict and a judgment notwithstanding the verdict?

  1. A directed verdict is granted before the jury reaches a verdict, while a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted after the jury reaches a verdict

  2. A directed verdict is granted by the judge, while a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted by the jury

  3. A directed verdict is granted when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, while a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted when there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The main difference between a directed verdict and a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is that a directed verdict is granted before the jury reaches a verdict, while a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted after the jury reaches a verdict.

What is the difference between a directed verdict and a mistrial?

  1. A directed verdict is granted when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, while a mistrial is granted when there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact

  2. A directed verdict is granted by the judge, while a mistrial is granted by the jury

  3. A directed verdict is granted before the jury reaches a verdict, while a mistrial is granted after the jury reaches a verdict

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

A directed verdict is granted when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, while a mistrial is granted when there is a problem with the trial that prevents it from continuing, such as a hung jury or a juror who is unable to continue serving.

- Hide questions