To maximize the welfare of the majority.

To ensure equal opportunities for all.

To promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

To protect the rights of the individual.

The first principle is concerned with the distribution of primary goods, while the second principle is concerned with the distribution of social and economic inequalities.

The first principle is concerned with the distribution of wealth, while the second principle is concerned with the distribution of power.

The first principle is concerned with the distribution of rights, while the second principle is concerned with the distribution of duties.

The first principle is concerned with the distribution of opportunities, while the second principle is concerned with the distribution of outcomes.

It ensures that people are not biased by their own personal interests when making decisions about justice.

It allows people to see the world from the perspective of others.

It helps people to understand the importance of cooperation.

It promotes a sense of empathy and compassion.

Rawls's theory of justice is based on the idea of equal opportunities, while utilitarianism is based on the idea of maximizing happiness.

Rawls's theory of justice is based on the idea of rights, while utilitarianism is based on the idea of consequences.

Rawls's theory of justice is based on the idea of fairness, while utilitarianism is based on the idea of efficiency.

Rawls's theory of justice is based on the idea of equality, while utilitarianism is based on the idea of liberty.

It is too idealistic and impractical.

It is unfair to those who are more talented or hardworking.

It does not take into account the importance of individual liberty.

It is too focused on equality and does not allow for sufficient differentiation.