In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the highest standard of proof and requires the prosecution to present evidence that is so strong that it leaves no room for doubt in the minds of the jurors.

In civil cases, the plaintiff must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest standard of proof and requires the plaintiff to present evidence that is more likely to be true than not.

In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the highest standard of proof and requires the prosecution to present evidence that is so strong that it leaves no room for doubt in the minds of the jurors.

In civil cases, the plaintiff must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest standard of proof and requires the plaintiff to present evidence that is more likely to be true than not.

In family law cases, the party seeking to modify or terminate a parental relationship must prove their case by clear and convincing evidence. This is a higher standard of proof than a preponderance of the evidence, but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt.

In administrative law cases, the party seeking to overturn an agency decision must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest standard of proof and requires the party to present evidence that is more likely to be true than not.

In tax court cases, the taxpayer must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest standard of proof and requires the taxpayer to present evidence that is more likely to be true than not.

In bankruptcy court cases, the debtor must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest standard of proof and requires the debtor to present evidence that is more likely to be true than not.

In small claims court cases, the plaintiff must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest standard of proof and requires the plaintiff to present evidence that is more likely to be true than not.

In arbitration cases, the parties must agree on the standard of proof that will be used. If the parties cannot agree, the arbitrator will decide which standard of proof to use. The most common standard of proof used in arbitration cases is a preponderance of the evidence.

Mediation is a process in which a neutral third party helps the parties to reach a settlement. There is no standard of proof used in mediation.

Negotiation is a process in which two or more parties try to reach an agreement. There is no standard of proof used in negotiation.

A settlement conference is a meeting between the parties to a lawsuit in which they try to reach a settlement. There is no standard of proof used in a settlement conference.

In a trial by jury, the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is the highest standard of proof and requires the prosecution to present evidence that is so strong that it leaves no room for doubt in the minds of the jurors.

In a trial by judge, the plaintiff must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the lowest standard of proof and requires the plaintiff to present evidence that is more likely to be true than not.