Universality is not a category of existence in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The four categories of existence are substance, quality, action, and particularity.

The primary goal of the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school is to understand the nature of reality. This is achieved through the study of logic and epistemology.

Analogy is not a type of pramāṇa in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The four types of pramāṇa are perception, inference, testimony, and comparison.

Hetvābhāsa is the term for the logical fallacies in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. Hetvābhāsa means 'fallacious reason'.

Analogical inference is not a type of inference in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The three types of inference are deductive inference, inductive inference, and abductive inference.

Tarka is the term for the process of elimination of alternatives in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. Tarka is a method of reasoning that involves considering all possible alternatives and eliminating those that are inconsistent with the evidence.

Air is not a type of substance in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The four types of substances are earth, water, fire, and ether.

Moksha is the term for the ultimate goal of human life in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. Moksha is a state of liberation from the cycle of birth and rebirth.

Sound is not a type of quality in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The four types of qualities are color, taste, smell, and touch.

Induction is the term for the process of reasoning from a particular instance to a general rule in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. Induction is a method of reasoning that involves observing a number of instances of a phenomenon and then inferring a general rule that applies to all instances of that phenomenon.

Breathing is not a type of action in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The four types of actions are walking, talking, thinking, and grasping.

Deduction is the term for the process of reasoning from a general rule to a particular instance in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. Deduction is a method of reasoning that involves applying a general rule to a specific case.

Quadruplicity is not a type of particularity in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The three types of particularities are unity, duality, and triplicity.

Analogy is the term for the process of reasoning from one particular instance to another particular instance in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. Analogy is a method of reasoning that involves comparing two similar cases and inferring that what is true of one case is also true of the other case.

Absolute absence is not a type of abhāva in the Nyaya-Vaiseshika school. The three types of abhāva are prior absence, posterior absence, and mutual absence.