Back
0

Legal Scepticism

Description: This quiz is designed to assess your understanding of legal skepticism, a school of thought that questions the legitimacy and authority of the law.
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: legal theory legal scepticism philosophy of law
Start the Quiz
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0
‹
›

Which of the following is a central tenet of legal skepticism?

  1. The law is always just and fair.

  2. The law is a product of social and political power.

  3. The law is based on objective and universal moral principles.

  4. The law is always effective in achieving its goals.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Legal skeptics argue that the law is not an objective or neutral set of rules, but rather a product of the social and political power structures that exist in a society.

Who is considered one of the most influential legal skeptics?

  1. John Austin

  2. H.L.A. Hart

  3. Ronald Dworkin

  4. Lon L. Fuller

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Lon L. Fuller was a prominent American legal philosopher who is known for his skeptical views on the law. He argued that the law is often arbitrary and unjust, and that it fails to live up to its own ideals.

What is the main argument of legal skeptics against the idea of legal positivism?

  1. Legal positivism is based on a false dichotomy between law and morality.

  2. Legal positivism ignores the role of social and political power in the creation and enforcement of law.

  3. Legal positivism is too focused on the formal aspects of law and neglects its substantive content.

  4. Legal positivism is incompatible with the idea of individual rights.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Legal skeptics argue that legal positivism's focus on the formal aspects of law, such as its rules and procedures, leads it to ignore the role of social and political power in the creation and enforcement of law.

What is the significance of legal skepticism in the study of law?

  1. It challenges the traditional view of law as a neutral and objective set of rules.

  2. It highlights the role of power and ideology in the creation and enforcement of law.

  3. It encourages a more critical and reflective approach to the study of law.

  4. All of the above.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Legal skepticism has had a significant impact on the study of law. It has challenged the traditional view of law as a neutral and objective set of rules, highlighted the role of power and ideology in the creation and enforcement of law, and encouraged a more critical and reflective approach to the study of law.

Which of the following is NOT a common criticism of legal skepticism?

  1. It is too pessimistic about the possibility of legal reform.

  2. It is too focused on the negative aspects of law and neglects its positive aspects.

  3. It is too abstract and theoretical and has little practical relevance.

  4. It is incompatible with the idea of individual rights.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Legal skepticism is not incompatible with the idea of individual rights. In fact, some legal skeptics argue that skepticism about the law is necessary to protect individual rights from being violated by the state.

What is the relationship between legal skepticism and legal realism?

  1. Legal skepticism is a more radical form of legal realism.

  2. Legal skepticism is a more moderate form of legal realism.

  3. Legal skepticism and legal realism are two distinct schools of thought with no connection.

  4. Legal skepticism is a subset of legal realism.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Legal skepticism is often seen as a more radical form of legal realism, as it goes beyond realism's critique of the formal aspects of law to question the legitimacy and authority of the law itself.

Which of the following is an example of a legal skeptical argument?

  1. The law is always just and fair.

  2. The law is a product of social and political power.

  3. The law is based on objective and universal moral principles.

  4. The law is always effective in achieving its goals.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The argument that the law is a product of social and political power is an example of a legal skeptical argument, as it questions the legitimacy and authority of the law by highlighting its connection to power structures.

What is the main challenge that legal skepticism poses to the idea of legal positivism?

  1. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is a product of social and political power.

  2. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is based on objective and universal moral principles.

  3. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is always effective in achieving its goals.

  4. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is always just and fair.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is a product of social and political power, arguing instead that law is a product of social and political power.

Which of the following is NOT a common criticism of legal skepticism?

  1. It is too pessimistic about the possibility of legal reform.

  2. It is too focused on the negative aspects of law and neglects its positive aspects.

  3. It is too abstract and theoretical and has little practical relevance.

  4. It is incompatible with the idea of individual rights.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Legal skepticism is not incompatible with the idea of individual rights. In fact, some legal skeptics argue that skepticism about the law is necessary to protect individual rights from being violated by the state.

What is the main argument of legal skeptics against the idea of legal positivism?

  1. Legal positivism is based on a false dichotomy between law and morality.

  2. Legal positivism ignores the role of social and political power in the creation and enforcement of law.

  3. Legal positivism is too focused on the formal aspects of law and neglects its substantive content.

  4. Legal positivism is incompatible with the idea of individual rights.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Legal skeptics argue that legal positivism's focus on the formal aspects of law, such as its rules and procedures, leads it to ignore the role of social and political power in the creation and enforcement of law.

What is the significance of legal skepticism in the study of law?

  1. It challenges the traditional view of law as a neutral and objective set of rules.

  2. It highlights the role of power and ideology in the creation and enforcement of law.

  3. It encourages a more critical and reflective approach to the study of law.

  4. All of the above.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Legal skepticism has had a significant impact on the study of law. It has challenged the traditional view of law as a neutral and objective set of rules, highlighted the role of power and ideology in the creation and enforcement of law, and encouraged a more critical and reflective approach to the study of law.

Which of the following is NOT a common criticism of legal skepticism?

  1. It is too pessimistic about the possibility of legal reform.

  2. It is too focused on the negative aspects of law and neglects its positive aspects.

  3. It is too abstract and theoretical and has little practical relevance.

  4. It is incompatible with the idea of individual rights.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Legal skepticism is not incompatible with the idea of individual rights. In fact, some legal skeptics argue that skepticism about the law is necessary to protect individual rights from being violated by the state.

What is the relationship between legal skepticism and legal realism?

  1. Legal skepticism is a more radical form of legal realism.

  2. Legal skepticism is a more moderate form of legal realism.

  3. Legal skepticism and legal realism are two distinct schools of thought with no connection.

  4. Legal skepticism is a subset of legal realism.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Legal skepticism is often seen as a more radical form of legal realism, as it goes beyond realism's critique of the formal aspects of law to question the legitimacy and authority of the law itself.

Which of the following is an example of a legal skeptical argument?

  1. The law is always just and fair.

  2. The law is a product of social and political power.

  3. The law is based on objective and universal moral principles.

  4. The law is always effective in achieving its goals.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The argument that the law is a product of social and political power is an example of a legal skeptical argument, as it questions the legitimacy and authority of the law by highlighting its connection to power structures.

What is the main challenge that legal skepticism poses to the idea of legal positivism?

  1. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is a product of social and political power.

  2. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is based on objective and universal moral principles.

  3. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is always effective in achieving its goals.

  4. Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is always just and fair.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Legal skepticism challenges the idea that law is a product of social and political power, arguing instead that law is a product of social and political power.

- Hide questions
ADVERTISEMENT

Find more quizzes from top tags

general knowledge
3615 Quizzes
119858 Questions
 technology
307 Quizzes
36705 Questions
 sports
963 Quizzes
19148 Questions
 history
1187 Quizzes
13475 Questions
 physics
598 Quizzes
13441 Questions
 biology
1160 Quizzes
12174 Questions
 science & technology
551 Quizzes
11015 Questions
 chemistry
490 Quizzes
9892 Questions
 maths
518 Quizzes
9324 Questions
 softskills
0 Quizzes
7131 Questions