- International Humanitarian Law
- International Humanitarian Law - Quizzes
- Legal Consequences of Violations of International Humanitarian Law
Legal Consequences of Violations of International Humanitarian Law
| Description: This quiz is designed to assess your knowledge of the legal consequences of violations of international humanitarian law. | |
| Number of Questions: 14 | |
| Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
| Tags: international humanitarian law legal consequences war crimes crimes against humanity genocide |
What is the primary legal framework for international humanitarian law?
-
The Geneva Conventions
-
The Hague Conventions
-
The United Nations Charter
-
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
The Geneva Conventions are a series of four treaties that were adopted in 1949 and form the cornerstone of international humanitarian law.
Which of the following is a war crime under international humanitarian law?
-
Intentionally killing civilians
-
Using chemical weapons
-
Torturing prisoners of war
-
All of the above
All of the above actions are considered war crimes under international humanitarian law.
What is the crime of genocide?
-
The intentional killing of a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality
-
The intentional causing of serious bodily or mental harm to a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality
-
The deliberate infliction of conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality
-
All of the above
All of the above actions are considered genocide under international humanitarian law.
What is the crime of crimes against humanity?
-
Murder
-
Rape
-
Torture
-
All of the above
All of the above actions are considered crimes against humanity under international humanitarian law.
Who can be held criminally responsible for violations of international humanitarian law?
-
Individuals
-
States
-
Both individuals and states
-
None of the above
Both individuals and states can be held criminally responsible for violations of international humanitarian law.
What is the International Criminal Court (ICC)?
-
A permanent international court that prosecutes individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide
-
A temporary international court that is established to prosecute individuals for specific crimes
-
A domestic court that prosecutes individuals for violations of international humanitarian law
-
None of the above
The ICC is a permanent international court that prosecutes individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
What is the principle of universal jurisdiction?
-
The principle that a state can prosecute individuals for crimes committed anywhere in the world, regardless of the nationality of the perpetrator or the victim
-
The principle that a state can prosecute individuals for crimes committed within its territory, regardless of the nationality of the perpetrator or the victim
-
The principle that a state can prosecute individuals for crimes committed against its nationals, regardless of where the crimes were committed
-
None of the above
The principle of universal jurisdiction allows states to prosecute individuals for crimes committed anywhere in the world, regardless of the nationality of the perpetrator or the victim.
What is the doctrine of command responsibility?
-
The principle that a military commander can be held criminally responsible for the crimes of his or her subordinates, even if the commander did not directly order or participate in the crimes
-
The principle that a military commander can be held criminally responsible for the crimes of his or her subordinates only if the commander directly ordered or participated in the crimes
-
The principle that a military commander cannot be held criminally responsible for the crimes of his or her subordinates
-
None of the above
The doctrine of command responsibility holds that a military commander can be held criminally responsible for the crimes of his or her subordinates, even if the commander did not directly order or participate in the crimes.
What is the principle of non-refoulement?
-
The principle that a state cannot return a person to a country where they would face persecution or torture
-
The principle that a state cannot return a person to a country where they have committed a crime
-
The principle that a state cannot return a person to a country where they are wanted for extradition
-
None of the above
The principle of non-refoulement prohibits states from returning a person to a country where they would face persecution or torture.
What is the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court?
-
The treaty that established the International Criminal Court
-
The treaty that defines the crimes that the International Criminal Court can prosecute
-
The treaty that sets out the procedures for the International Criminal Court
-
All of the above
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is the treaty that established the International Criminal Court, defines the crimes that the Court can prosecute, and sets out the procedures for the Court.
What is the crime of aggression?
-
The use of armed force by one state against another state without justification
-
The threat of the use of armed force by one state against another state
-
The preparation for the use of armed force by one state against another state
-
All of the above
The crime of aggression includes the use of armed force by one state against another state without justification, the threat of the use of armed force by one state against another state, and the preparation for the use of armed force by one state against another state.
What is the principle of complementarity?
-
The principle that the International Criminal Court can only prosecute individuals if the national courts of the state where the crimes were committed are unable or unwilling to do so
-
The principle that the International Criminal Court can only prosecute individuals if the national courts of the state where the crimes were committed have already convicted them
-
The principle that the International Criminal Court can only prosecute individuals if the national courts of the state where the crimes were committed have already acquitted them
-
None of the above
The principle of complementarity states that the International Criminal Court can only prosecute individuals if the national courts of the state where the crimes were committed are unable or unwilling to do so.
What is the crime of apartheid?
-
The systematic segregation and discrimination of one racial group by another racial group
-
The forcible transfer of population
-
The persecution of a racial group
-
All of the above
The crime of apartheid includes the systematic segregation and discrimination of one racial group by another racial group, the forcible transfer of population, and the persecution of a racial group.
What is the crime of enforced disappearance?
-
The arrest, detention, or abduction of a person by a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the detention or to provide information about the person's fate or whereabouts
-
The killing of a person by a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the killing or to provide information about the person's fate or whereabouts
-
The torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment of a person by a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment or to provide information about the person's fate or whereabouts
-
All of the above
The crime of enforced disappearance includes the arrest, detention, or abduction of a person by a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the detention or to provide information about the person's fate or whereabouts, the killing of a person by a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the killing or to provide information about the person's fate or whereabouts, and the torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment of a person by a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment or to provide information about the person's fate or whereabouts.