The primary objective of the Indian Tort Law is to provide compensation to victims of civil wrongs, thereby restoring them to the position they would have been in had the tort not been committed.

Actual damage is not an essential element of negligence in Indian Tort Law. The plaintiff must prove that the defendant breached their duty of care, which resulted in a legally recognized injury or loss.

Strict liability is the legal principle that holds a person liable for the consequences of their actions, even if those consequences were not intended. This principle is often applied in cases involving abnormally dangerous activities or products.

Inevitability is not a defense to negligence in Indian Tort Law. The defendant cannot escape liability by arguing that the harm was inevitable or unavoidable.

Respondeat superior is the legal principle that holds an employer liable for the torts committed by their employees while acting within the scope of their employment. This principle is based on the idea that the employer has a duty to control the conduct of their employees.

Negligent infliction of emotional distress is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for emotional distress caused by the negligence of another. This principle is based on the idea that a person has a duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing emotional harm to others.

Vicarious liability is the legal principle that holds a person liable for the torts committed by their independent contractors. This principle is based on the idea that the person who hires the independent contractor has a duty to ensure that the contractor performs their work in a safe and non-negligent manner.

Product liability is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a product that is defective. This principle is based on the idea that the manufacturer or seller of the product has a duty to ensure that the product is safe for use.

Strict liability is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a wild animal. This principle is based on the idea that the owner or keeper of the animal has a duty to prevent the animal from causing harm to others.

Insanity defense is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a person who is mentally ill. This principle is based on the idea that a person who is mentally ill is not capable of forming the intent to commit a tort.

Intoxication defense is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a person who is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. This principle is based on the idea that a person who is intoxicated is not capable of forming the intent to commit a tort.

Infancy defense is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a person who is a minor. This principle is based on the idea that a minor is not capable of forming the intent to commit a tort.

Self-defense defense is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a person who is acting in self-defense. This principle is based on the idea that a person has a right to defend themselves from harm.

Defense of property defense is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a person who is acting in defense of property. This principle is based on the idea that a person has a right to defend their property from harm.

Defense of others defense is the legal principle that allows a person to recover damages for harm caused by a person who is acting in defense of others. This principle is based on the idea that a person has a right to defend others from harm.