Economic analysis in tort law aims to establish the optimal level of liability that balances the costs and benefits of accident prevention and compensation.

Duty of care refers to the legal obligation of an individual to avoid causing harm to others through their actions or omissions.

Negligence is the legal principle that imposes liability on individuals who fail to exercise reasonable care and cause harm to others as a result.

Contributory negligence is a defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the accident and thus reduces or eliminates the defendant's liability.

Proximate cause refers to the direct and foreseeable consequence of an individual's actions that results in harm to another person or property.

Damages in tort law serve multiple purposes, including compensating the plaintiff for their losses, punishing the defendant for their wrongdoing, and deterring future harmful conduct.

General damages are a type of compensatory damages awarded to compensate the plaintiff for non-economic losses, such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life.

The Coase Theorem states that in the absence of transaction costs, the efficient allocation of resources will occur regardless of the initial assignment of property rights.

Strict liability is a legal principle that holds individuals liable for damages caused by their actions, regardless of whether they were negligent or intended to cause harm.

Assumption of risk is a defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of harm by engaging in a particular activity.

Intentional infliction of emotional distress is a legal principle that allows individuals to recover damages for severe emotional distress caused by the intentional or reckless conduct of another.

Assault is an intentional tort that involves causing the plaintiff to apprehend an imminent harmful or offensive contact.

Strict liability is a legal principle that holds manufacturers and sellers liable for damages caused by defective products, regardless of whether they were negligent or intended to cause harm.

Assumption of risk is a defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of harm by using a product in a manner that was not intended or foreseeable.

Negligent misrepresentation is a legal principle that allows individuals to recover damages for harm caused by the negligent provision of false information.