The top 1% of earners will capture a larger and larger share of the total income as the overall income inequality increases.

The top 1% of earners will capture a smaller and smaller share of the total income as the overall income inequality increases.

The top 1% of earners will capture a constant share of the total income regardless of the overall income inequality.

The top 1% of earners will capture a larger and larger share of the total income as the overall income equality increases.

Studies have shown that the top 1% of earners have seen their share of the total income increase in recent decades, while the share of the bottom 99% has decreased.

Studies have shown that the top 1% of earners have seen their share of the total income decrease in recent decades, while the share of the bottom 99% has increased.

Studies have shown that the top 1% of earners have seen their share of the total income remain constant in recent decades, while the share of the bottom 99% has also remained constant.

Studies have shown that the top 1% of earners have seen their share of the total income increase in recent decades, while the share of the bottom 99% has also increased.

Some critics argue that the Saez Hypothesis is based on flawed data and that the top 1% of earners do not actually capture as large a share of the total income as claimed.

Some critics argue that the Saez Hypothesis ignores the fact that the wealthy often invest their money in ways that benefit the economy as a whole.

Some critics argue that the Saez Hypothesis is based on a misunderstanding of how income inequality works and that it is not necessarily a bad thing.

All of the above.

The Saez Hypothesis suggests that policies that reduce income inequality may also help to reduce the share of income captured by the top 1%.

The Saez Hypothesis suggests that policies that increase income inequality may also help to increase the share of income captured by the top 1%.

The Saez Hypothesis suggests that policies that have no effect on income inequality will also have no effect on the share of income captured by the top 1%.

The Saez Hypothesis suggests that policies that reduce income inequality may also help to increase the share of income captured by the top 1%.

It is difficult to accurately measure the share of income captured by the top 1%.

It is difficult to control for other factors that may be affecting income inequality.

It is difficult to find a long enough time period over which to test the hypothesis.

All of the above.