The expansion of the definition of a refugee to include climate change-induced displacement.

The creation of a global refugee agency.

The development of a more comprehensive system for burden-sharing among states.

The abolition of the refugee status altogether.

The lack of a clear definition of climate change-induced displacement.

The unwillingness of states to accept climate change-induced refugees.

The lack of resources to assist climate change-induced refugees.

All of the above.

It would improve coordination and cooperation among states in responding to refugee crises.

It would provide a more centralized and efficient system for refugee protection.

It would increase the resources available to assist refugees.

All of the above.

The unwillingness of states to accept more refugees.

The lack of a fair and equitable system for allocating refugees among states.

The lack of resources to assist refugees.

All of the above.

Increased refugee flows and displacement.

Heightened tensions and conflict between states.

A decline in the protection of refugees.

All of the above.

Advocating for refugee rights.

Donating to refugee organizations.

Volunteering with refugee organizations.

All of the above.

Increase public awareness of refugee issues.

Build political will to address refugee challenges.

Develop new and innovative solutions to refugee problems.

All of the above.

The adoption of the Global Compact on Refugees.

The creation of the UN Refugee Agency.

The development of new international refugee law standards.

All of the above.

The growing number of refugees.

The unwillingness of states to accept refugees.

The lack of resources to assist refugees.

All of the above.

It will become more comprehensive and effective.

It will become less comprehensive and effective.

It will remain the same.

It is uncertain.