Economic justice is primarily concerned with the just distribution of resources, including income, wealth, and opportunities, among individuals and groups in society.

Egalitarianism is a principle of economic justice that emphasizes the importance of equality in the distribution of resources. It argues that all individuals should have equal access to opportunities and resources, regardless of their social or economic background.

Libertarianism emphasizes the importance of individual liberty and the right to private property. It argues that individuals should be free to pursue their economic interests without government interference.

Rawlsian Justice, proposed by John Rawls, suggests that just distribution should be determined through a hypothetical social contract in which individuals, unaware of their own social and economic positions, would agree on principles of justice.

Utilitarianism emphasizes the importance of maximizing the overall welfare of society. In the context of economic justice, it suggests that the distribution of resources should be such that it generates the greatest amount of total welfare.

Marxian Justice, rooted in the ideas of Karl Marx, argues that the distribution of resources under capitalism is unjust because it is based on the exploitation of labor. It proposes a socialist system where the means of production are collectively owned and controlled.

A common critique of libertarianism is that it ignores the importance of equality in the distribution of resources. It is argued that libertarianism allows for significant inequalities to arise, which can lead to social and economic injustice.

Desert Theory argues that the distribution of resources should be based on merit and effort. It suggests that individuals who work harder and contribute more to society deserve a greater share of resources.

Distributive justice is a branch of economic justice that focuses on the fair distribution of resources among individuals and groups in society. It addresses questions such as: What is a just distribution of income, wealth, and opportunities?

Prioritarianism emphasizes the importance of prioritizing the needs of the most disadvantaged individuals or groups in society. It argues that the distribution of resources should be such that it benefits those who are worst off.

A common critique of utilitarianism is that it ignores the importance of individual rights and liberties. It is argued that utilitarianism may justify policies that infringe on individual rights in order to maximize overall welfare.

Socialism emphasizes the importance of social equality and the elimination of class distinctions. It proposes a system where the means of production are collectively owned and controlled, and resources are distributed according to need.

A common critique of Rawlsian Justice is that it is too idealistic and impractical. It is argued that the hypothetical social contract proposed by Rawls is unrealistic and that it is difficult to implement in real-world scenarios.

Mutualism emphasizes the importance of voluntary exchange and cooperation as the basis for a just economic system. It proposes a system where individuals and cooperatives freely associate to produce and distribute goods and services.

A common critique of Marxian Justice is that it is too idealistic and impractical. It is argued that the socialist system proposed by Marx is unrealistic and that it has failed in practice in many countries.