Matter is the only reality.

Mind is the only reality.

Matter and mind are equally real.

Reality is unknowable.

The argument from illusion.

The argument from dependence.

The argument from coherence.

The argument from simplicity.

We can never directly experience the material world, only our ideas of it.

The material world is constantly changing, so it cannot be real.

The material world is too vast and complex to be real.

The material world is full of contradictions, so it cannot be real.

The material world depends on our minds for its existence.

The material world depends on God for its existence.

The material world depends on other material objects for its existence.

The material world depends on abstract ideas for its existence.

The material world is coherent and orderly, which suggests that it is real.

The material world is incoherent and chaotic, which suggests that it is not real.

The material world is both coherent and chaotic, which suggests that it is both real and unreal.

The material world is neither coherent nor chaotic, which suggests that it is unknowable.

The material world is simple and easy to understand, which suggests that it is real.

The material world is complex and difficult to understand, which suggests that it is not real.

The material world is both simple and complex, which suggests that it is both real and unreal.

The material world is neither simple nor complex, which suggests that it is unknowable.

There is no such thing as objective reality.

The physical world is a figment of our imagination.

God is the only real being.

All of the above.

It is too subjective.

It is too dependent on God.

It is too skeptical.

All of the above.

He argued that our ideas are not private, but are shared by all minds.

He argued that our ideas are caused by God.

He argued that our ideas are real in their own right.

All of the above.

He argued that God is not a necessary being.

He argued that God is not the only real being.

He argued that God is not the cause of our ideas.

None of the above.

He argued that we can have certain knowledge of the material world.

He argued that we can have probable knowledge of the material world.

He argued that we cannot have any knowledge of the material world.

None of the above.

It has been influential in the development of modern philosophy.

It has been criticized by many philosophers.

It has been largely forgotten.

All of the above.

George Berkeley

David Hume

Immanuel Kant

All of the above.

They argue that it is too subjective.

They argue that it is too dependent on God.

They argue that it is too skeptical.

All of the above.

It will continue to be influential in the development of philosophy.

It will be largely forgotten.

It is impossible to say.

None of the above.