The Montreal Convention is the primary international treaty that governs the settlement of aviation disputes through arbitration.

The primary objective of the Montreal Convention is to facilitate the settlement of aviation disputes through arbitration and other dispute resolution mechanisms.

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is the body responsible for administering the Montreal Convention.

The Montreal Convention covers disputes arising from accidents and incidents involving aircraft, including death or injury to passengers and crew, damage to property, and loss or delay of baggage.

Arbitration under the Montreal Convention is governed by the principles of neutrality and impartiality, confidentiality, and finality of the award.

The arbitral tribunal in aviation disputes is responsible for determining the facts of the case, applying the relevant law, and issuing a binding award.

Arbitration in aviation disputes offers advantages such as speed and efficiency, confidentiality, and flexibility.

Arbitration in aviation disputes may face challenges such as cost, lack of transparency, and enforceability of awards.

The challenges associated with arbitration in aviation disputes can be addressed by adopting streamlined arbitration rules, promoting transparency in arbitration proceedings, and ensuring the enforceability of arbitration awards.

Recent developments in arbitration and aviation law include the rise of online arbitration, the increasing use of mediation and other ADR methods, and the adoption of new arbitration rules and guidelines.

The future of arbitration in aviation disputes is likely to see a combination of all of the above options, with arbitration continuing to be a preferred method of dispute resolution, while also becoming more streamlined and efficient, and coexisting with other ADR methods.

Key cases that have shaped the development of arbitration and aviation law include Air India v. Nergesh Meerza, Swissair v. Zurich Airport, and British Airways v. Laker Airways.

Arbitration in aviation disputes differs from arbitration in other sectors due to the involvement of specialized arbitrators with expertise in aviation law, the application of specific aviation laws and regulations, and the need for expedited proceedings due to the time-sensitive nature of aviation disputes.

Arbitrators handling aviation disputes should be aware of ethical considerations such as the duty to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, the need to maintain impartiality and neutrality, and the obligation to protect the confidentiality of the proceedings.

Parties to an aviation dispute can ensure that the arbitration process is fair and impartial by selecting arbitrators with the appropriate expertise and experience, agreeing on clear and concise arbitration rules, and providing all relevant evidence and information to the arbitrators.