The Indian Evidence Act

Description: The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is a comprehensive law that governs the admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings in India. It was enacted during the British Raj and has been amended several times since then. The Act is divided into 11 chapters and 167 sections, and it covers a wide range of topics, including the definition of evidence, the rules of evidence, and the examination of witnesses.
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: indian evidence act evidence law legal procedure
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the purpose of the Indian Evidence Act?

  1. To define the rules of evidence in legal proceedings

  2. To establish the procedure for the examination of witnesses

  3. To determine the admissibility of evidence

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The Indian Evidence Act serves all of the purposes mentioned in the options. It defines the rules of evidence, establishes the procedure for the examination of witnesses, and determines the admissibility of evidence.

Which of the following is not a type of evidence under the Indian Evidence Act?

  1. Oral evidence

  2. Documentary evidence

  3. Real evidence

  4. Hearsay evidence


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Hearsay evidence is not a type of evidence under the Indian Evidence Act. It is defined as evidence that is given by a witness who has not personally seen or heard the facts in question, but has heard them from someone else.

What is the rule against hearsay evidence?

  1. Hearsay evidence is admissible in all cases

  2. Hearsay evidence is admissible only in certain cases

  3. Hearsay evidence is inadmissible in all cases

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The rule against hearsay evidence is a fundamental principle of evidence law. It states that hearsay evidence is inadmissible in all cases, unless it falls within one of the exceptions to the rule.

What are the exceptions to the rule against hearsay evidence?

  1. Dying declarations

  2. Confessions

  3. Ancient documents

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

There are a number of exceptions to the rule against hearsay evidence, including dying declarations, confessions, and ancient documents. These exceptions are based on the idea that the evidence is reliable, even though it is not given by a witness who has personally seen or heard the facts in question.

What is the best evidence rule?

  1. The best evidence rule requires that the original document be produced in court

  2. The best evidence rule requires that the secondary evidence be produced in court

  3. The best evidence rule requires that the witness testify in person

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The best evidence rule is a rule of evidence that requires that the original document be produced in court, if it is available. This is because the original document is the most reliable evidence of its contents.

What are the consequences of violating the best evidence rule?

  1. The evidence will be excluded from the trial

  2. The witness will be punished for contempt of court

  3. The jury will be instructed to disregard the evidence

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The consequence of violating the best evidence rule is that the evidence will be excluded from the trial. This is because the evidence is considered to be unreliable.

What is the rule against opinion evidence?

  1. Opinion evidence is admissible in all cases

  2. Opinion evidence is admissible only in certain cases

  3. Opinion evidence is inadmissible in all cases

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The rule against opinion evidence is a rule of evidence that states that opinion evidence is admissible only in certain cases. This is because opinion evidence is considered to be less reliable than factual evidence.

What are the exceptions to the rule against opinion evidence?

  1. Expert testimony

  2. Lay opinion testimony

  3. Character evidence

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

There are a number of exceptions to the rule against opinion evidence, including expert testimony, lay opinion testimony, and character evidence. These exceptions are based on the idea that the opinion evidence is reliable, even though it is not based on personal knowledge of the facts in question.

What is the rule against character evidence?

  1. Character evidence is admissible in all cases

  2. Character evidence is admissible only in certain cases

  3. Character evidence is inadmissible in all cases

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The rule against character evidence is a rule of evidence that states that character evidence is admissible only in certain cases. This is because character evidence is considered to be less relevant than evidence of specific acts.

What are the exceptions to the rule against character evidence?

  1. To prove a person's identity

  2. To prove a person's motive

  3. To prove a person's intent

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

There are a number of exceptions to the rule against character evidence, including to prove a person's identity, motive, or intent. These exceptions are based on the idea that character evidence is relevant to these issues.

What is the rule against privilege?

  1. The rule against privilege protects the confidentiality of communications between certain persons

  2. The rule against privilege protects the privacy of certain individuals

  3. The rule against privilege protects the freedom of speech

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The rule against privilege is a rule of evidence that protects the confidentiality of communications between certain persons, the privacy of certain individuals, and the freedom of speech. This rule prevents certain types of evidence from being admitted in court.

What are the different types of privilege?

  1. Attorney-client privilege

  2. Doctor-patient privilege

  3. Priest-penitent privilege

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

There are a number of different types of privilege, including attorney-client privilege, doctor-patient privilege, and priest-penitent privilege. These privileges protect the confidentiality of communications between certain persons.

What are the consequences of violating the rule against privilege?

  1. The evidence will be excluded from the trial

  2. The witness will be punished for contempt of court

  3. The jury will be instructed to disregard the evidence

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The consequences of violating the rule against privilege can include the exclusion of the evidence from the trial, the punishment of the witness for contempt of court, and the instruction of the jury to disregard the evidence.

What is the rule against leading questions?

  1. Leading questions are not allowed in direct examination

  2. Leading questions are not allowed in cross-examination

  3. Leading questions are not allowed in both direct and cross-examination

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The rule against leading questions is a rule of evidence that prohibits the use of leading questions in direct examination. This is because leading questions are considered to be unfair, as they suggest the answer that the witness should give.

What are the consequences of violating the rule against leading questions?

  1. The question will be disallowed

  2. The witness will be instructed to answer the question without being led

  3. The jury will be instructed to disregard the answer

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The consequences of violating the rule against leading questions can include the disallowance of the question, the instruction of the witness to answer the question without being led, and the instruction of the jury to disregard the answer.

- Hide questions