The primary objective of film censorship in India is to protect public morals and values, as outlined in the Cinematograph Act of 1952.

The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is the government body responsible for film censorship in India.

Film censorship in India can be content-based, political, or religious in nature.

Censorship can negatively impact the economic viability of the film industry in several ways.

Content-based censorship is most likely to have a negative impact on the economic viability of the film industry, as it can lead to lower box office revenues and discourage investment in film production.

Content-based censorship can negatively impact the economic viability of the film industry in a number of ways, including the removal of scenes or dialogue, changes to the ending of films, and even the banning of films altogether.

Political censorship can negatively impact the economic viability of the film industry in a number of ways, including the banning of films that are critical of the government, discouraging filmmakers from making such films, and leading to the removal of scenes or dialogue that are critical of the government.

Religious censorship can negatively impact the economic viability of the film industry in a number of ways, including the banning of films that are considered blasphemous, discouraging filmmakers from making such films, and leading to the removal of scenes or dialogue that are considered blasphemous.

There are a number of arguments in favor of film censorship, including the protection of public morals and values, the promotion of national unity and integrity, the prevention of the spread of misinformation, and the safeguarding of national security.

There are a number of arguments against film censorship, including the stifling of creativity and free expression, the banning of films that are not harmful, and the suppression of dissent and criticism.

There are a number of potential alternatives to film censorship, including film classification, media literacy education, and self-regulation by the film industry.

North Korea has the most stringent film censorship laws in the world.

Sweden has the most liberal film censorship laws in the world.

It is difficult to say what the future of film censorship will be.

There are a number of things that can be done to improve the film censorship process in India, including making the process more transparent, involving more stakeholders in the process, and providing filmmakers with more opportunities to appeal censorship decisions.