Sabda, or verbal testimony, is considered a valid source of knowledge in the Mimamsa School of Perception.

The Mimamsa School believes that the primary function of perception is to facilitate action, rather than to provide knowledge of the world.

Comparison, or upamana, is not considered a valid source of knowledge in the Mimamsa School.

Arthapatti, or postulation, is the process of interpreting verbal testimony in the Mimamsa School.

The Mimamsa School holds that verbal testimony is superior to perception as a source of knowledge.

Pratyaksha, or direct perception, is a key concept in the Mimamsa School's theory of perception.

The Mimamsa School considers perception to be a secondary source of knowledge, after verbal testimony.

The Mimamsa School does not consider perception to be infallible.

Anumana, or inference, is the process of inferring the existence of something from its effects in the Mimamsa School.

The Mimamsa School considers perception and inference to be equally valid sources of knowledge.

Anumana, or inference, is a key concept in the Mimamsa School's theory of inference.

The Mimamsa School divides inference into three types: categorical, hypothetical, and disjunctive.

The Mimamsa School does not consider the acceptance of inference by all rational people to be a necessary condition for its validity.

Sabda, or verbal testimony, is the process of interpreting a Vedic text in the Mimamsa School.

The Mimamsa School considers verbal testimony to be the primary source of knowledge.