The primary objective of film censorship in India is to protect national security by preventing the distribution and exhibition of films that may pose a threat to the sovereignty and integrity of the nation.

The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is the government body responsible for film censorship in India. It is tasked with examining films and determining their suitability for public exhibition.

The CBFC evaluates films based on a range of criteria, including violence and gore, sexual content, political and religious themes, and any other content that may be deemed inappropriate for public viewing.

The CBFC issues four main categories of film certification: U (unrestricted public exhibition), UA (unrestricted public exhibition with parental guidance), A (restricted to adults only), and S (restricted to a specialized audience).

A film that is denied certification by the CBFC cannot be distributed or exhibited in India. The film's release may also be delayed or restricted, and the film's producers may face legal penalties.

Censorship has had a significant impact on the distribution and exhibition of films in India. It has led to the self-censorship of filmmakers, limited the diversity of films available to audiences, and increased the cost of film production.

Proponents of film censorship argue that it is necessary to protect children from harmful content, prevent the spread of misinformation, and uphold moral values and cultural norms.

Opponents of film censorship argue that it violates freedom of expression, stifles creativity and artistic expression, and is ineffective in achieving its stated goals.

Alternative approaches to film regulation that have been proposed include film classification systems, self-regulation by the film industry, and media literacy education.

Film censorship is still in place in India, but there have been some reforms in recent years to make the process more transparent and accountable.