PIL and Public Health

Description: This quiz is designed to assess your knowledge of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and its role in safeguarding public health in India.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: pil public health indian law
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the primary objective of Public Interest Litigation (PIL)?

  1. To protect the rights of individuals

  2. To address issues of public importance

  3. To provide legal aid to the poor and marginalized

  4. To promote social justice


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

PIL aims to address issues that affect the general public, such as environmental degradation, consumer rights, and public health.

Which landmark case established the concept of PIL in India?

  1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India

  2. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation

  3. Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India

  4. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The 1985 case of Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation is widely regarded as the foundation of PIL in India.

What is the locus standi requirement in PIL cases?

  1. The petitioner must have a personal stake in the matter

  2. The petitioner must be directly affected by the issue

  3. The petitioner must represent a group or class of people

  4. The petitioner must have a genuine interest in the public welfare


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

In PIL cases, the petitioner does not need to have a personal stake or be directly affected by the issue. They must demonstrate a genuine concern for the public welfare.

Which of the following is NOT a category of PIL cases related to public health?

  1. Environmental pollution

  2. Food safety and adulteration

  3. Access to healthcare

  4. Tobacco control


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Tobacco control is not typically considered a category of PIL cases related to public health.

What is the role of the judiciary in PIL cases involving public health?

  1. To interpret and enforce relevant laws and regulations

  2. To issue directives to government agencies and authorities

  3. To monitor the implementation of public health policies

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The judiciary plays a multifaceted role in PIL cases involving public health, including interpreting laws, issuing directives, and monitoring policy implementation.

Which PIL case led to the ban on the sale of gutka and pan masala in India?

  1. Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India

  2. Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India

  3. Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The 2013 case of Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India resulted in the ban on the sale of gutka and pan masala in India.

What is the significance of PIL in promoting public health in India?

  1. It provides a legal framework for addressing public health issues

  2. It empowers citizens to seek justice for public health violations

  3. It holds government agencies accountable for their actions or inaction

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

PIL plays a vital role in promoting public health by providing a legal framework, empowering citizens, and holding government agencies accountable.

Which PIL case resulted in the Supreme Court's directive to provide free and compulsory education to children aged 6 to 14 years?

  1. Unnikrishnan J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh

  2. Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka

  3. Asha Devi v. State of Bihar

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The 1993 case of Unnikrishnan J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh led to the Supreme Court's directive on free and compulsory education.

What is the concept of 'continuing mandamus' in the context of PIL cases?

  1. The court retains jurisdiction over the case to ensure compliance with its orders

  2. The court can issue periodic directions to monitor the implementation of its orders

  3. The court can hold government officials in contempt of court for non-compliance

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Continuing mandamus allows the court to retain jurisdiction, issue periodic directions, and hold officials accountable for non-compliance.

Which PIL case led to the Supreme Court's order to clean up the Ganga River?

  1. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

  2. Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh

  3. Almitra H. Patel v. Union of India

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The 1985 case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India resulted in the Supreme Court's order to clean up the Ganga River.

What is the role of PIL in addressing the issue of air pollution in India?

  1. PIL cases have led to the closure of polluting industries

  2. PIL cases have prompted the government to implement stricter emission standards

  3. PIL cases have raised awareness about the health effects of air pollution

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

PIL has played a significant role in addressing air pollution by leading to industry closures, stricter standards, and raising public awareness.

Which PIL case resulted in the Supreme Court's order to provide clean drinking water to all citizens?

  1. Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar

  2. A.P. Pollution Control Board v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu

  3. Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The 2010 case of Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar led to the Supreme Court's order on clean drinking water.

What is the significance of PIL in ensuring the right to health in India?

  1. It has led to the expansion of healthcare services to marginalized communities

  2. It has prompted the government to allocate more resources for public health

  3. It has raised awareness about the importance of preventive healthcare

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

PIL has played a crucial role in ensuring the right to health by expanding services, increasing resources, and raising awareness.

Which PIL case led to the Supreme Court's order to ban the sale of tobacco products near educational institutions?

  1. Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India

  2. Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India

  3. Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The 2001 case of Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India resulted in the ban on tobacco sales near educational institutions.

- Hide questions