0

Judicial Review in South Africa

Description: This quiz will test your knowledge of Judicial Review in South Africa. It covers topics such as the history of judicial review, the powers of the courts, and the role of the judiciary in a democracy.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: judicial review south africa constitutional law
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the purpose of judicial review?

  1. To ensure that the government acts within the limits of its powers

  2. To protect the rights of citizens

  3. To interpret the constitution

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Judicial review is a process by which the courts can review the actions of the government to ensure that they are acting within the limits of their powers, to protect the rights of citizens, and to interpret the constitution.

What are the powers of the courts in South Africa?

  1. To declare laws unconstitutional

  2. To order the government to take or refrain from taking certain actions

  3. To award damages to individuals who have been harmed by the government

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The courts in South Africa have the power to declare laws unconstitutional, to order the government to take or refrain from taking certain actions, and to award damages to individuals who have been harmed by the government.

What is the role of the judiciary in a democracy?

  1. To protect the rights of citizens

  2. To ensure that the government acts within the limits of its powers

  3. To interpret the constitution

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The judiciary plays a vital role in a democracy by protecting the rights of citizens, ensuring that the government acts within the limits of its powers, and interpreting the constitution.

What is the history of judicial review in South Africa?

  1. It was introduced in the 1996 Constitution

  2. It has been part of South African law since the early 1900s

  3. It was introduced in the 1983 Constitution

  4. It has been part of South African law since the 1960s


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Judicial review was introduced in South Africa in the 1996 Constitution.

What are some of the landmark cases in which the South African courts have exercised judicial review?

  1. S v Makwanyane

  2. Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie

  3. President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the landmark cases in which the South African courts have exercised judicial review include S v Makwanyane, Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie, and President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union.

What are some of the challenges facing judicial review in South Africa?

  1. A lack of resources

  2. A lack of public awareness

  3. Political interference

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the challenges facing judicial review in South Africa include a lack of resources, a lack of public awareness, and political interference.

What are some of the ways in which judicial review can be strengthened in South Africa?

  1. Increasing the resources available to the courts

  2. Raising public awareness of judicial review

  3. Protecting the independence of the judiciary

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the ways in which judicial review can be strengthened in South Africa include increasing the resources available to the courts, raising public awareness of judicial review, and protecting the independence of the judiciary.

What is the future of judicial review in South Africa?

  1. It will become more important as the country continues to develop

  2. It will become less important as the country becomes more stable

  3. It will remain the same

  4. It is difficult to say


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The future of judicial review in South Africa is difficult to predict. It is possible that it will become more important as the country continues to develop, or that it will become less important as the country becomes more stable. It is also possible that it will remain the same.

What are some of the criticisms of judicial review?

  1. It is too expensive

  2. It is too slow

  3. It is too political

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the criticisms of judicial review include that it is too expensive, too slow, and too political.

What are some of the defenses of judicial review?

  1. It is necessary to protect the rights of citizens

  2. It is necessary to ensure that the government acts within the limits of its powers

  3. It is necessary to interpret the constitution

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Some of the defenses of judicial review include that it is necessary to protect the rights of citizens, to ensure that the government acts within the limits of its powers, and to interpret the constitution.

What is the relationship between judicial review and the rule of law?

  1. Judicial review is a necessary component of the rule of law

  2. The rule of law is a necessary component of judicial review

  3. Judicial review and the rule of law are independent of each other

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Judicial review is a necessary component of the rule of law because it ensures that the government acts within the limits of its powers and that the rights of citizens are protected.

What is the relationship between judicial review and democracy?

  1. Judicial review is a necessary component of democracy

  2. Democracy is a necessary component of judicial review

  3. Judicial review and democracy are independent of each other

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Judicial review is a necessary component of democracy because it ensures that the government is accountable to the people and that the rights of citizens are protected.

What is the relationship between judicial review and human rights?

  1. Judicial review is a necessary component of human rights

  2. Human rights are a necessary component of judicial review

  3. Judicial review and human rights are independent of each other

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Judicial review is a necessary component of human rights because it ensures that the government respects and protects the rights of citizens.

What is the relationship between judicial review and the separation of powers?

  1. Judicial review is a necessary component of the separation of powers

  2. The separation of powers is a necessary component of judicial review

  3. Judicial review and the separation of powers are independent of each other

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Judicial review is a necessary component of the separation of powers because it ensures that each branch of government acts within the limits of its powers.

- Hide questions