Assumption of risk

Contributory negligence

Misuse of product

Unavoidable accident

Assumption of risk is a complete defense, while contributory negligence is a partial defense.

Assumption of risk requires the plaintiff to have known of the specific risk that caused the injury, while contributory negligence does not.

Assumption of risk is only available in cases involving inherently dangerous products, while contributory negligence is available in all cases.

None of the above.

A defense that the product was not used for its intended purpose.

A defense that the product was not used in a reasonably foreseeable manner.

A defense that the product was not used in a manner that was consistent with the instructions or warnings provided with the product.

All of the above.

An express warranty is created by a written or oral statement by the seller, while an implied warranty is created by law.

An express warranty is only available for new products, while an implied warranty is available for both new and used products.

An express warranty is always more specific than an implied warranty.

None of the above.

Two years from the date of injury.

Four years from the date of injury.

Six years from the date of injury.

It varies from state to state.

The plaintiff must prove that the product was defective.

The plaintiff must prove that the defect caused the injury.

The plaintiff must prove that the manufacturer or seller was negligent.

All of the above.

The product was not used for its intended purpose.

The product was not used in a reasonably foreseeable manner.

The product was not used in a manner that was consistent with the instructions or warnings provided with the product.

All of the above.

In a strict liability claim, the plaintiff does not need to prove that the manufacturer or seller was negligent.

In a strict liability claim, the plaintiff only needs to prove that the product was defective and that the defect caused the injury.

In a strict liability claim, the plaintiff does not need to prove that the product was used for its intended purpose.

All of the above.

To notify consumers of a potential safety hazard.

To remove defective products from the market.

To prevent further injuries or deaths.

All of the above.

A product recall is issued when a product is found to be defective, while a product warning is issued when a product is found to be potentially hazardous.

A product recall is issued by the manufacturer, while a product warning is issued by the government.

A product recall is more serious than a product warning.

None of the above.

Design defects

Manufacturing defects

Marketing defects

All of the above.

A design defect is a defect in the product's design, while a manufacturing defect is a defect in the product's manufacture.

A design defect is always more serious than a manufacturing defect.

A design defect can be corrected by a product recall, while a manufacturing defect can be corrected by a product repair.

None of the above.

A defect in the product's labeling or instructions.

A defect in the product's advertising or promotion.

A defect in the product's packaging.

All of the above.

An express warranty is created by a written or oral statement by the seller, while an implied warranty is created by law.

An express warranty is only available for new products, while an implied warranty is available for both new and used products.

An express warranty is always more specific than an implied warranty.

None of the above.

Two years from the date of purchase.

Four years from the date of purchase.

Six years from the date of purchase.

It varies from state to state.