0

Product Liability Law: Misuse of Products

Description: Product Liability Law: Misuse of Products
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: product liability misuse of products negligence defenses
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the general rule regarding a manufacturer's liability for injuries caused by the misuse of its products?

  1. Manufacturers are strictly liable for injuries caused by the misuse of their products.

  2. Manufacturers are liable for injuries caused by the misuse of their products only if they were negligent in designing or manufacturing the product.

  3. Manufacturers are not liable for injuries caused by the misuse of their products, regardless of whether they were negligent.

  4. Manufacturers are liable for injuries caused by the misuse of their products only if the misuse was foreseeable.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Manufacturers are not strictly liable for injuries caused by the misuse of their products. However, they may be liable if they were negligent in designing or manufacturing the product, or if the misuse was foreseeable.

What is the most common defense raised by manufacturers in product liability lawsuits involving misuse of products?

  1. Assumption of risk

  2. Contributory negligence

  3. Product misuse

  4. Lack of privity


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The most common defense raised by manufacturers in product liability lawsuits involving misuse of products is that the product was misused by the plaintiff.

What is the difference between assumption of risk and contributory negligence?

  1. Assumption of risk is a complete defense, while contributory negligence is a partial defense.

  2. Assumption of risk is a subjective defense, while contributory negligence is an objective defense.

  3. Assumption of risk is based on the plaintiff's knowledge of the risk, while contributory negligence is based on the plaintiff's failure to exercise reasonable care.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Assumption of risk is a complete defense, while contributory negligence is a partial defense. Assumption of risk is a subjective defense, while contributory negligence is an objective defense. Assumption of risk is based on the plaintiff's knowledge of the risk, while contributory negligence is based on the plaintiff's failure to exercise reasonable care.

What is the effect of a plaintiff's assumption of risk on their ability to recover damages in a product liability lawsuit?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are not affected.

  4. The plaintiff's damages are increased in proportion to the defendant's degree of fault.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Assumption of risk is a complete defense to a product liability lawsuit. This means that the plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

What is the effect of a plaintiff's contributory negligence on their ability to recover damages in a product liability lawsuit?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are not affected.

  4. The plaintiff's damages are increased in proportion to the defendant's degree of fault.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Contributory negligence is a partial defense to a product liability lawsuit. This means that the plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault.

What is the burden of proof in a product liability lawsuit involving misuse of products?

  1. The plaintiff must prove that the product was defective.

  2. The defendant must prove that the product was misused.

  3. The plaintiff must prove that the product was misused.

  4. The defendant must prove that the product was defective.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The burden of proof in a product liability lawsuit involving misuse of products is on the defendant to prove that the product was misused.

What factors does a court consider in determining whether a product was misused?

  1. The intended use of the product

  2. The foreseeable uses of the product

  3. The warnings and instructions provided with the product

  4. The consumer's knowledge of the risks associated with the product

  5. All of the above


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

A court considers all of the above factors in determining whether a product was misused.

What is the effect of a product recall on a manufacturer's liability for injuries caused by the product?

  1. The manufacturer is strictly liable for all injuries caused by the product.

  2. The manufacturer is liable for injuries caused by the product only if it was negligent in recalling the product.

  3. The manufacturer is not liable for injuries caused by the product, regardless of whether it was negligent in recalling the product.

  4. The manufacturer is liable for injuries caused by the product only if the recall was not effective.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

A product recall does not automatically make a manufacturer strictly liable for all injuries caused by the product. However, the manufacturer may be liable for injuries caused by the product if it was negligent in recalling the product.

What is the difference between a product recall and a product warning?

  1. A product recall is issued when a product is found to be defective, while a product warning is issued when a product is found to be potentially dangerous.

  2. A product recall is issued by the manufacturer, while a product warning is issued by the government.

  3. A product recall is mandatory, while a product warning is voluntary.

  4. All of the above.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

A product recall is issued when a product is found to be defective, while a product warning is issued when a product is found to be potentially dangerous. A product recall is issued by the manufacturer, while a product warning is issued by the government. A product recall is mandatory, while a product warning is voluntary.

What is the purpose of a product warning?

  1. To inform consumers of the risks associated with using the product

  2. To protect manufacturers from liability for injuries caused by the product

  3. To both inform consumers of the risks associated with using the product and to protect manufacturers from liability for injuries caused by the product

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The purpose of a product warning is to both inform consumers of the risks associated with using the product and to protect manufacturers from liability for injuries caused by the product.

What factors does a court consider in determining the adequacy of a product warning?

  1. The nature of the risk

  2. The severity of the risk

  3. The likelihood of the risk occurring

  4. The consumer's knowledge of the risk

  5. All of the above


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

A court considers all of the above factors in determining the adequacy of a product warning.

What is the effect of an inadequate product warning on a manufacturer's liability for injuries caused by the product?

  1. The manufacturer is strictly liable for all injuries caused by the product.

  2. The manufacturer is liable for injuries caused by the product only if it was negligent in providing the warning.

  3. The manufacturer is not liable for injuries caused by the product, regardless of whether it was negligent in providing the warning.

  4. The manufacturer is liable for injuries caused by the product only if the warning was not effective.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

An inadequate product warning does not automatically make a manufacturer strictly liable for all injuries caused by the product. However, the manufacturer may be liable for injuries caused by the product if it was negligent in providing the warning.

What is the difference between an express warranty and an implied warranty?

  1. An express warranty is created by a written statement by the manufacturer, while an implied warranty is created by law.

  2. An express warranty is created by an oral statement by the manufacturer, while an implied warranty is created by a written statement by the manufacturer.

  3. An express warranty is created by a written statement by the seller, while an implied warranty is created by law.

  4. An express warranty is created by an oral statement by the seller, while an implied warranty is created by a written statement by the seller.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

An express warranty is created by a written statement by the manufacturer, while an implied warranty is created by law.

What are the most common types of implied warranties?

  1. Warranty of merchantability

  2. Warranty of fitness for a particular purpose

  3. Warranty of title

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The most common types of implied warranties are warranty of merchantability, warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and warranty of title.

What is the effect of a breach of warranty on a manufacturer's liability for injuries caused by the product?

  1. The manufacturer is strictly liable for all injuries caused by the product.

  2. The manufacturer is liable for injuries caused by the product only if it was negligent in breaching the warranty.

  3. The manufacturer is not liable for injuries caused by the product, regardless of whether it was negligent in breaching the warranty.

  4. The manufacturer is liable for injuries caused by the product only if the breach of warranty was the proximate cause of the injuries.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

A breach of warranty does not automatically make a manufacturer strictly liable for all injuries caused by the product. However, the manufacturer may be liable for injuries caused by the product if the breach of warranty was the proximate cause of the injuries.

- Hide questions