Symbolic exchange is the term used in economic anthropology to describe the process by which language is used to create and maintain social and economic relationships.

Ritual is not a type of economic discourse identified by anthropologists. Bargaining, negotiation, and storytelling are all forms of economic discourse.

Economic socialization is the term for the process by which children learn the language and economic practices of their community.

According to economic anthropologists, language serves multiple functions in economic transactions, including conveying information, establishing social relationships, and creating trust.

Language does not directly promote economic equality. It can influence economic behavior in other ways, such as shaping people's perceptions of value, creating new economic opportunities, and facilitating communication and coordination.

Symbolic violence is the term for the use of language to create and maintain social and economic boundaries between groups.

Social networks are not a type of linguistic capital identified by economic anthropologists. Vocabulary, grammar, and accent are all forms of linguistic capital.

Linguistic hegemony is the term for the process by which language is used to create and maintain economic inequality.

The relationship between language and economic development is complex and varies across contexts. There is no simple answer to the question of whether language is necessary or sufficient for economic development.

Preserving traditional economic practices is not a way in which language can be used to promote economic development. Language can be used to promote economic development in other ways, such as facilitating communication and coordination, creating new economic opportunities, and promoting economic equality.

Linguistic hegemony is the term for the use of language to create and maintain economic power.

According to economic anthropologists, language is both a cause and a consequence of economic inequality.

Preserving traditional economic practices is not a way in which language can be used to reduce economic inequality. Language can be used to reduce economic inequality in other ways, such as promoting economic equality, creating new economic opportunities, and facilitating communication and coordination.

Economic discourse is the term for the use of language to create and maintain economic stability.

The relationship between language and economic growth is complex and varies across contexts. There is no simple answer to the question of whether language is necessary or sufficient for economic growth.