To ensure equal treatment for all trading partners.

To promote free trade among member countries.

To reduce trade barriers and tariffs.

To protect domestic industries from foreign competition.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement.

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).

The United Nations Charter.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) Articles of Agreement.

The MFN Principle applies to all trading partners, while the national treatment principle applies only to domestic industries.

The MFN Principle prohibits discrimination against foreign goods, while the national treatment principle prohibits discrimination against foreign services.

The MFN Principle is a multilateral agreement, while the national treatment principle is a bilateral agreement.

The MFN Principle is legally binding, while the national treatment principle is not.

National security concerns.

Public health and safety concerns.

Environmental protection concerns.

All of the above.

It reduces trade barriers and tariffs.

It promotes fair competition among trading partners.

It increases transparency and predictability in international trade.

All of the above.

The difficulty in defining and classifying goods and services.

The potential for free-riding by non-MFN members.

The risk of trade diversion.

All of the above.

The MFN Principle is a form of reciprocity.

The MFN Principle is incompatible with reciprocity.

The MFN Principle is a necessary condition for reciprocity.

The MFN Principle is a sufficient condition for reciprocity.

It can lead to the erosion of domestic industries.

It can be used as a tool for economic coercion.

It can hinder the development of infant industries.

All of the above.

It is a standalone principle that does not interact with other agreements.

It is incorporated into many international trade agreements and arrangements.

It is superseded by other international trade agreements and arrangements.

It is incompatible with other international trade agreements and arrangements.

The expansion of the MFN Principle to cover services and intellectual property.

The inclusion of the MFN Principle in regional trade agreements.

The use of the MFN Principle as a tool for economic coercion.

All of the above.

The WTO is responsible for monitoring and enforcing the MFN Principle.

The WTO has no role in enforcing the MFN Principle.

The WTO can only enforce the MFN Principle if it is included in a WTO agreement.

The WTO can only enforce the MFN Principle if it is included in a bilateral trade agreement.

It benefits developed countries more than developing countries.

It benefits developing countries more than developed countries.

It benefits both developed and developing countries equally.

It has no impact on the trade relations between developed and developing countries.

The preferential trade agreement approach.

The free trade agreement approach.

The customs union approach.

All of the above.

It will continue to be a fundamental principle of international trade.

It will be replaced by alternative approaches to trade liberalization.

It will be weakened by the rise of regional trade agreements.

It will be strengthened by the expansion of the WTO.

The MFN Principle is a necessary condition for economic integration.

The MFN Principle is a sufficient condition for economic integration.

The MFN Principle is unrelated to economic integration.

The MFN Principle is incompatible with economic integration.