Lack of awareness and understanding among the general public

Limited access to ADR facilities in rural and remote areas

Inadequate training and expertise of ADR practitioners

High costs associated with ADR proceedings

Inadequate public education and outreach efforts

Negative perceptions about the effectiveness of ADR

Lack of trust in ADR practitioners

All of the above

It makes it difficult for people in these areas to access ADR services

It leads to increased costs for ADR proceedings

It undermines the credibility of ADR as a fair and impartial process

All of the above

Lack of standardized training programs

Inadequate regulation of ADR practitioners

Limited opportunities for continuing education and professional development

All of the above

It undermines the credibility of ADR as a binding dispute resolution mechanism

It leads to increased litigation, as parties may seek to enforce ADR awards through the courts

It discourages parties from using ADR in the first place, as they may be concerned about the enforceability of the outcome

All of the above

Lack of resources and funding

Inadequate infrastructure and facilities

Limited capacity to handle a large volume of cases

All of the above

It can lead to bias and discrimination in ADR proceedings

It undermines the credibility of ADR as a fair and impartial process

It discourages parties from using ADR, as they may feel that they will not be treated fairly

All of the above

Limited opportunities for professional development

Lack of recognition and respect from the legal community

Low compensation and poor working conditions

All of the above

It creates uncertainty and confusion about the legal framework for ADR

It makes it difficult to enforce ADR awards

It discourages parties from using ADR, as they may be concerned about the legal validity of the outcome

All of the above

Lack of information and resources about ADR

Difficulty in finding qualified and experienced ADR practitioners

Concerns about the cost and duration of ADR proceedings

All of the above

Traditional values and beliefs may influence parties' willingness to use ADR

Power imbalances and social hierarchies can affect the dynamics of ADR proceedings

Language and communication barriers can pose challenges for ADR practitioners

All of the above

Lack of political will and commitment

Limited resources and funding

Resistance from the legal community

All of the above

It leads to duplication of efforts and resources

It makes it difficult to develop and implement effective ADR policies and programs

It undermines the credibility of ADR as a coherent and reliable dispute resolution mechanism

All of the above

Limited access to data and information on ADR

Lack of funding for research projects

Limited opportunities for collaboration and networking

All of the above

It leads to misconceptions and negative perceptions about ADR

It discourages parties from using ADR, as they may not be aware of its benefits

It makes it difficult for ADR institutions and practitioners to promote ADR effectively

All of the above