ADR aims to resolve disputes in a timely and cost-efficient manner, avoiding the lengthy and expensive process of litigation.

ADR is based on the principle of voluntariness, meaning that parties must agree to participate in the process.

The mediator's role is to create a conducive environment for negotiation and help parties find a mutually acceptable solution.

Arbitration is a popular method of ADR where parties present their case to a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator, who makes a binding decision.

In mediation, the mediator assists parties in reaching an agreement, but the outcome is not legally binding. In arbitration, the arbitrator's decision is final and binding on both parties.

ADR is commonly used when parties are unable to resolve their dispute through direct negotiation, when they want to avoid the time and expense of litigation, and when they want to maintain a good relationship with each other.

ADR offers several benefits, including its speed, cost-effectiveness, confidentiality, and ability to preserve relationships between parties.

ADR may not be appropriate for all types of disputes, finding a qualified and impartial mediator or arbitrator can be challenging, and enforcing the terms of a settlement agreement may be difficult.

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the primary law governing ADR in India.

Courts play a role in ADR by enforcing the terms of settlement agreements, appointing mediators and arbitrators, and reviewing the decisions of mediators and arbitrators.

Arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and negotiation are common types of ADR used in India.

Litigation is a traditional method of dispute resolution through the courts, while arbitration, mediation, and conciliation are all forms of ADR.

Arbitration is binding, meaning that the decision of the arbitrator is final and legally enforceable, while litigation is non-binding, meaning that the parties can appeal the decision of the court.

The conciliator's role is to facilitate communication between parties and help them reach an agreement, but the outcome is not legally binding.

Mediation is non-binding, meaning that the parties are not legally bound to accept the mediator's proposal, while conciliation is binding, meaning that the parties are legally bound to accept the conciliator's proposal.