The International Criminal Court (ICC) is the first permanent, treaty-based international court established to prosecute individuals for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community, including genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.

The principle of complementarity is a fundamental principle of international criminal law that establishes that the ICC is a court of last resort. It means that the ICC can only exercise its jurisdiction over a case if national courts are unable or unwilling to genuinely investigate or prosecute the case.

The Rome Statute is the treaty that established the International Criminal Court (ICC). It defines the crimes over which the ICC has jurisdiction, the procedures for investigating and prosecuting cases, and the rights of the accused.

Drug trafficking is not a crime within the jurisdiction of the ICC. The ICC has jurisdiction over the most serious crimes of concern to the international community, including genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.

The principle of individual criminal responsibility is a fundamental principle of international criminal law. It establishes that individuals can be held criminally responsible for their actions, even if they were acting under orders from a superior. This principle is essential for ensuring that individuals are held accountable for their crimes and that the rule of law is upheld.

The crime of genocide is defined as the intentional killing of a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality, or the intentional causing of serious bodily or mental harm to a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality, or the intentional destruction of a group of people's property based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality.

The crime of crimes against humanity is defined as widespread or systematic attacks against a civilian population, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, or other inhumane acts committed against a civilian population, or persecution against a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality.

The crime of war crimes is defined as serious violations of the laws and customs of war, including killing or injuring civilians or prisoners of war, destroying or appropriating property without military necessity, and using prohibited weapons or methods of warfare.

The crime of aggression is defined as the planning, preparation, initiation, or execution of an act of aggression, which is the use of armed force by one state against another state without justification, or the invasion or occupation of a state's territory by another state.

The principle of universal jurisdiction is a principle of international criminal law that allows any state to prosecute individuals for international crimes, regardless of where the crimes were committed or the nationality of the accused. This principle is based on the idea that international crimes are crimes against the international community as a whole, and that all states have an interest in prosecuting and punishing those who commit such crimes.

The defense of superior orders is not a defense to a charge of genocide. This is because the principle of individual criminal responsibility establishes that individuals can be held criminally responsible for their actions, even if they were acting under orders from a superior.

The defense of superior orders is not a defense to a charge of crimes against humanity. This is because the principle of individual criminal responsibility establishes that individuals can be held criminally responsible for their actions, even if they were acting under orders from a superior.

The defense of superior orders is not a defense to a charge of war crimes. This is because the principle of individual criminal responsibility establishes that individuals can be held criminally responsible for their actions, even if they were acting under orders from a superior.

The defense of superior orders is not a defense to a charge of the crime of aggression. This is because the principle of individual criminal responsibility establishes that individuals can be held criminally responsible for their actions, even if they were acting under orders from a superior.