Gautama, also known as Akshapada Gautama, is considered the father of Indian logic for his contributions to the Nyaya school of thought.

Indian logic primarily aims to develop a system of reasoning that allows for valid inferences and sound arguments.

The Nyaya school of Indian logic places a strong emphasis on inference and logical reasoning as means of acquiring knowledge and establishing truth.

Non sequitur is a logical fallacy in which a conclusion is drawn from a premise that is not logically related to it, resulting in an invalid argument.

The Mimamsa school of Indian logic primarily deals with the interpretation of Vedic texts, seeking to establish their authority and provide a framework for understanding their meaning.

Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy in which a conclusion is drawn based on an insufficient number of observations or evidence, leading to an unreliable or biased generalization.

The Vaisheshika school of Indian logic places a strong emphasis on perception and direct experience as reliable sources of knowledge, arguing that these provide the foundation for understanding the world.

False dichotomy is a logical fallacy in which a conclusion is drawn based on a false dilemma, presenting only two options when there are more, thus limiting the scope of the argument.

The Vedanta school of Indian logic focuses on the concept of Brahman as the ultimate reality, exploring the relationship between the individual soul and the universal consciousness.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy in which a conclusion is drawn based on an assumption that is not explicitly stated or supported by evidence, essentially assuming the conclusion as a premise.

Gautama, also known as Akshapada Gautama, is renowned for his contributions to the Nyaya school of logic and the development of the theory of inference, which laid the foundation for Indian logical thought.

False analogy is a logical fallacy in which a conclusion is drawn based on a weak or irrelevant analogy, where the similarities between the two situations are insufficient to support the argument.

The Vedanta school of Indian logic is known for its emphasis on the concept of liberation (moksha) through self-realization and the realization of the true nature of reality, seeking to transcend the limitations of the material world.

Appeal to emotion is a logical fallacy in which a conclusion is drawn based on an emotional appeal rather than logical reasoning, attempting to persuade the audience through emotional manipulation.

Kanada, also known as Kashyapa, is renowned for his contributions to the Vaisheshika school of logic and the development of the atomic theory, which proposed that all matter is composed of indivisible particles called atoms.