The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is the primary legal framework governing healthcare for children in India. It provides for the care and protection of children in need of care and protection, including those who are sick or injured.

The right to free and compulsory education is not guaranteed to children under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. This right is guaranteed under the Rights of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

The age of majority in India is 18 years. This means that individuals below the age of 18 are considered minors and are subject to special legal protections.

In India, minors can consent to medical treatment if they are mature enough to understand the nature and consequences of the treatment. This is known as the doctrine of mature minor consent.

The legal principle that allows minors to consent to medical treatment in India is the doctrine of mature minor consent. This doctrine allows minors who are mature enough to understand the nature and consequences of the treatment to consent to it without parental consent.

Courts consider all of the following factors in determining whether a minor is mature enough to consent to medical treatment: the minor's age, the minor's intelligence and understanding, and the minor's emotional maturity.

The legal doctrine that allows parents to make medical decisions for their children is the doctrine of parens patriae. This doctrine gives parents the authority to make decisions on behalf of their children, including medical decisions.

The legal principle that requires healthcare providers to act in the best interests of the child is the doctrine of best interests of the child. This doctrine requires healthcare providers to make decisions that are in the best interests of the child, even if the child's parents disagree.

The legal doctrine that allows courts to make medical decisions for children who are unable to make their own decisions is the doctrine of substituted judgment. This doctrine allows courts to make decisions that the child would have made if they were able to do so.

The legal principle that requires healthcare providers to obtain informed consent from patients before providing treatment is the doctrine of informed consent. This doctrine requires healthcare providers to provide patients with all of the information they need to make an informed decision about their treatment.

The elements of informed consent include disclosure of the risks and benefits of the treatment, disclosure of the alternatives to the treatment, and disclosure of the prognosis without the treatment.

All of the above are responsible for obtaining informed consent from a minor patient. The minor patient must be able to understand the information provided and must agree to the treatment. The minor patient's parents must also agree to the treatment. The healthcare provider must provide all of the information necessary for the minor patient and their parents to make an informed decision.

All of the above are consequences of failing to obtain informed consent from a patient. The patient may sue the healthcare provider for negligence, the patient may refuse to pay for the treatment, and the healthcare provider may lose their license to practice medicine.

The legal principle that allows healthcare providers to refuse to provide treatment to patients is the doctrine of conscientious objection. This doctrine allows healthcare providers to refuse to provide treatment that is contrary to their religious or moral beliefs.

All of the above are limits of the doctrine of conscientious objection. Healthcare providers cannot refuse to provide emergency care, healthcare providers cannot refuse to provide treatment to patients who are minors, and healthcare providers cannot refuse to provide treatment to patients who are pregnant.