Proximate cause

Cause-in-fact

Foreseeability

Negligence

Proximate cause is the cause that is closest in time to the injury, while cause-in-fact is the cause that actually caused the injury.

Proximate cause is the cause that is most significant in causing the injury, while cause-in-fact is the cause that is least significant in causing the injury.

Proximate cause is the cause that is most foreseeable, while cause-in-fact is the cause that is least foreseeable.

Proximate cause is the cause that is most likely to cause the injury, while cause-in-fact is the cause that is least likely to cause the injury.

The manufacturer must have foreseen that the product would cause the type of injury that occurred.

The manufacturer must have foreseen that the product would cause some type of injury.

The manufacturer must have foreseen that the product would cause the specific injury that occurred.

The manufacturer must have foreseen that the product would cause any type of injury.

Compensatory damages, punitive damages, and nominal damages

Compensatory damages, punitive damages, and consequential damages

Compensatory damages, punitive damages, and incidental damages

Compensatory damages, punitive damages, and special damages

To compensate the plaintiff for their losses

To punish the defendant for their wrongdoing

To deter the defendant from engaging in similar conduct in the future

To send a message to other manufacturers that they will be held liable for their defective products

To compensate the plaintiff for their losses

To punish the defendant for their wrongdoing

To deter the defendant from engaging in similar conduct in the future

To send a message to other manufacturers that they will be held liable for their defective products

To compensate the plaintiff for their losses

To punish the defendant for their wrongdoing

To deter the defendant from engaging in similar conduct in the future

To send a message to other manufacturers that they will be held liable for their defective products

The nature and extent of the plaintiff's injuries

The defendant's conduct

The plaintiff's conduct

All of the above

It varies from state to state

It is two years from the date of the injury

It is four years from the date of the injury

It is six years from the date of the injury

The product was not defective

The plaintiff's misuse of the product caused the injury

The plaintiff's failure to warn of the product's dangers caused the injury

All of the above

The plaintiff must prove that the product was defective

The defendant must prove that the product was not defective

The plaintiff must prove that the product caused the injury

The defendant must prove that the product did not cause the injury

Strict liability is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable for any injury caused by its product, regardless of fault, while negligence is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable only if it was negligent in designing, manufacturing, or selling the product.

Strict liability is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable only if it was negligent in designing, manufacturing, or selling the product, while negligence is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable for any injury caused by its product, regardless of fault.

Strict liability is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable for any injury caused by its product, regardless of fault, while negligence is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable only if it was negligent in designing, manufacturing, or selling the product and the plaintiff was contributorily negligent.

Strict liability is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable only if it was negligent in designing, manufacturing, or selling the product and the plaintiff was contributorily negligent, while negligence is based on the theory that the manufacturer is liable for any injury caused by its product, regardless of fault.

A design defect is a defect that exists in the product's design, while a manufacturing defect is a defect that occurs during the manufacturing process.

A design defect is a defect that occurs during the manufacturing process, while a manufacturing defect is a defect that exists in the product's design.

A design defect is a defect that is caused by the manufacturer's negligence, while a manufacturing defect is a defect that is caused by a natural disaster.

A design defect is a defect that is caused by a natural disaster, while a manufacturing defect is a defect that is caused by the manufacturer's negligence.

A warning defect is a defect in the product's warning label, while a failure to warn defect is a defect that occurs when the manufacturer fails to provide any warning at all.

A warning defect is a defect that occurs when the manufacturer fails to provide any warning at all, while a failure to warn defect is a defect in the product's warning label.

A warning defect is a defect that is caused by the manufacturer's negligence, while a failure to warn defect is a defect that is caused by a natural disaster.

A warning defect is a defect that is caused by a natural disaster, while a failure to warn defect is a defect that is caused by the manufacturer's negligence.

An express warranty is a warranty that is written in the product's packaging or advertising, while an implied warranty is a warranty that is created by law.

An express warranty is a warranty that is created by law, while an implied warranty is a warranty that is written in the product's packaging or advertising.

An express warranty is a warranty that is caused by the manufacturer's negligence, while an implied warranty is a warranty that is caused by a natural disaster.

An express warranty is a warranty that is caused by a natural disaster, while an implied warranty is a warranty that is caused by the manufacturer's negligence.