Parliamentary Immunities

Description: This quiz tests your knowledge on Parliamentary Immunities, which are special privileges granted to members of parliament to ensure their independence and freedom of speech.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: parliamentary immunities indian politics parliamentary proceedings
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the purpose of parliamentary immunities?

  1. To ensure the independence of members of parliament

  2. To protect members of parliament from legal action

  3. To allow members of parliament to speak freely without fear of reprisal

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Parliamentary immunities are granted to members of parliament to ensure their independence, protect them from legal action, and allow them to speak freely without fear of reprisal.

What are the different types of parliamentary immunities?

  1. Immunity from arrest

  2. Immunity from prosecution

  3. Immunity from defamation

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The different types of parliamentary immunities include immunity from arrest, immunity from prosecution, and immunity from defamation.

What is the extent of immunity from arrest?

  1. Members of parliament cannot be arrested for any crime

  2. Members of parliament can only be arrested for serious crimes

  3. Members of parliament can only be arrested for crimes committed while in parliament

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Members of parliament can only be arrested for serious crimes, such as treason, murder, or rape.

What is the extent of immunity from prosecution?

  1. Members of parliament cannot be prosecuted for any crime

  2. Members of parliament can only be prosecuted for serious crimes

  3. Members of parliament can only be prosecuted for crimes committed while in parliament

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Members of parliament can only be prosecuted for crimes committed while in parliament, and only with the permission of the speaker of the house.

What is the extent of immunity from defamation?

  1. Members of parliament cannot be sued for defamation

  2. Members of parliament can only be sued for defamation for statements made in parliament

  3. Members of parliament can only be sued for defamation for statements made outside of parliament

  4. None of the above


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Members of parliament can only be sued for defamation for statements made in parliament, and only with the permission of the speaker of the house.

What are the arguments in favor of parliamentary immunities?

  1. Parliamentary immunities are necessary to ensure the independence of members of parliament

  2. Parliamentary immunities are necessary to protect members of parliament from legal action

  3. Parliamentary immunities are necessary to allow members of parliament to speak freely without fear of reprisal

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The arguments in favor of parliamentary immunities include the need to ensure the independence of members of parliament, to protect them from legal action, and to allow them to speak freely without fear of reprisal.

What are the arguments against parliamentary immunities?

  1. Parliamentary immunities allow members of parliament to get away with crimes

  2. Parliamentary immunities prevent members of parliament from being held accountable for their actions

  3. Parliamentary immunities undermine the rule of law

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The arguments against parliamentary immunities include the concern that they allow members of parliament to get away with crimes, that they prevent members of parliament from being held accountable for their actions, and that they undermine the rule of law.

How can parliamentary immunities be reformed?

  1. By limiting the scope of parliamentary immunities

  2. By making parliamentary immunities subject to judicial review

  3. By creating a special tribunal to hear cases involving members of parliament

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Parliamentary immunities can be reformed by limiting their scope, making them subject to judicial review, or creating a special tribunal to hear cases involving members of parliament.

What are some examples of parliamentary immunities in practice?

  1. In the United Kingdom, members of parliament cannot be arrested while parliament is in session

  2. In the United States, members of Congress cannot be sued for defamation for statements made in Congress

  3. In India, members of parliament cannot be prosecuted for crimes committed while in parliament

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Examples of parliamentary immunities in practice include the immunity from arrest of members of parliament in the United Kingdom, the immunity from defamation of members of Congress in the United States, and the immunity from prosecution of members of parliament in India.

What are some recent controversies involving parliamentary immunities?

  1. In 2017, a member of the British Parliament was arrested for sexual assault

  2. In 2018, a member of the US Congress was accused of sexual harassment

  3. In 2019, a member of the Indian Parliament was convicted of corruption

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Recent controversies involving parliamentary immunities include the arrest of a member of the British Parliament for sexual assault, the accusation of sexual harassment against a member of the US Congress, and the conviction of a member of the Indian Parliament for corruption.

What is the future of parliamentary immunities?

  1. Parliamentary immunities will be abolished

  2. Parliamentary immunities will be reformed

  3. Parliamentary immunities will remain unchanged

  4. It is unclear what the future of parliamentary immunities will be


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The future of parliamentary immunities is uncertain. Some argue that they should be abolished, while others argue that they should be reformed. It is unclear what the outcome of this debate will be.

What is the significance of parliamentary immunities in a democracy?

  1. Parliamentary immunities are essential for the functioning of a democracy

  2. Parliamentary immunities are a necessary evil

  3. Parliamentary immunities are an outdated concept

  4. Parliamentary immunities are a threat to democracy


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Parliamentary immunities are essential for the functioning of a democracy because they allow members of parliament to speak freely and represent their constituents without fear of reprisal.

How do parliamentary immunities balance the need for accountability with the need for independence?

  1. Parliamentary immunities strike a balance between accountability and independence

  2. Parliamentary immunities prioritize accountability over independence

  3. Parliamentary immunities prioritize independence over accountability

  4. Parliamentary immunities do not strike a balance between accountability and independence


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Parliamentary immunities strike a balance between accountability and independence by allowing members of parliament to speak freely and represent their constituents without fear of reprisal, while also holding them accountable for their actions through mechanisms such as recall elections and impeachment.

What are some of the challenges to reforming parliamentary immunities?

  1. The difficulty of finding a consensus on the need for reform

  2. The fear that reform could undermine the independence of parliament

  3. The concern that reform could lead to increased political polarization

  4. All of the above


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The challenges to reforming parliamentary immunities include the difficulty of finding a consensus on the need for reform, the fear that reform could undermine the independence of parliament, and the concern that reform could lead to increased political polarization.

- Hide questions