Back
0

Comparative Negligence

Description: This quiz is designed to assess your understanding of the legal concept of comparative negligence. It covers various aspects of comparative negligence, including its definition, application, and impact on personal injury lawsuits.
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: comparative negligence personal injury torts law
Start the Quiz
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0
‹
›

What is the primary purpose of comparative negligence laws?

  1. To determine the degree of fault of each party involved in an accident.

  2. To assign blame to one party for the purpose of punishment.

  3. To provide financial compensation to the injured party.

  4. To prevent future accidents from occurring.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Comparative negligence laws aim to fairly apportion liability among multiple parties involved in an accident, based on their respective contributions to the incident.

In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, what happens if the plaintiff is found to be 50% at fault for an accident?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced by 50%.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are increased by 50%.

  4. The plaintiff is awarded punitive damages.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault.

Which of the following is NOT a common type of comparative negligence system?

  1. Pure comparative negligence

  2. Modified comparative negligence

  3. Contributory negligence

  4. Strict liability

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Strict liability is a legal principle that holds a party responsible for damages regardless of their level of fault. It is not a type of comparative negligence system.

In a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction, what happens if the plaintiff is found to be 60% at fault for an accident?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced by 60%.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are increased by 60%.

  4. The plaintiff is awarded punitive damages.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

In a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault, up to a certain threshold.

What is the main difference between pure comparative negligence and modified comparative negligence?

  1. In pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages are always reduced in proportion to their degree of fault, while in modified comparative negligence, they may not be.

  2. In pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages if they are found to be more than 50% at fault, while in modified comparative negligence, they are not.

  3. In pure comparative negligence, the defendant is always liable for some portion of the damages, while in modified comparative negligence, they may not be.

  4. In pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages are increased in proportion to their degree of fault, while in modified comparative negligence, they are not.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The main difference between pure comparative negligence and modified comparative negligence is that in pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages are always reduced in proportion to their degree of fault, regardless of the degree of fault of the defendant. In modified comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages may not be reduced if their degree of fault is below a certain threshold.

Which of the following is NOT a factor that courts consider when determining the degree of fault of a party in a comparative negligence case?

  1. The conduct of the party

  2. The foreseeability of the accident

  3. The severity of the injuries

  4. The amount of damages suffered

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The amount of damages suffered by a party is not a factor that courts consider when determining the degree of fault of that party in a comparative negligence case.

In a contributory negligence jurisdiction, what happens if the plaintiff is found to be even 1% at fault for an accident?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced by 1%.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are increased by 1%.

  4. The plaintiff is awarded punitive damages.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

In a contributory negligence jurisdiction, the plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages if they are found to be even 1% at fault for an accident.

Which of the following is NOT a potential benefit of comparative negligence laws?

  1. They promote fairness and equity in personal injury lawsuits.

  2. They encourage parties to take steps to prevent accidents.

  3. They reduce the number of personal injury lawsuits filed.

  4. They increase the cost of insurance premiums.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Comparative negligence laws do not typically increase the cost of insurance premiums. In fact, they may actually lead to lower premiums by reducing the number of personal injury lawsuits filed.

In a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction, what happens if the plaintiff is found to be 49% at fault for an accident?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced by 49%.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are increased by 49%.

  4. The plaintiff is awarded punitive damages.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

In a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault, up to a certain threshold. In this case, the plaintiff's damages would be reduced by 49%.

Which of the following is NOT a common defense to a comparative negligence claim?

  1. Assumption of risk

  2. Contributory negligence

  3. Statute of limitations

  4. Act of God

Show answer
Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Statute of limitations is not a defense to a comparative negligence claim. It is a legal principle that sets a time limit for filing a lawsuit.

In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, what happens if the defendant is found to be 100% at fault for an accident?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced by 100%.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are increased by 100%.

  4. The plaintiff is awarded punitive damages.

Show answer
Correct Option: C
Explanation:

In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages are not reduced at all if the defendant is found to be 100% at fault for an accident. In fact, the plaintiff's damages may be increased by 100% if the defendant's conduct is found to be particularly egregious.

Which of the following is NOT a potential drawback of comparative negligence laws?

  1. They can lead to lengthy and complex trials.

  2. They can make it difficult for plaintiffs to recover damages.

  3. They can encourage parties to engage in risky behavior.

  4. They can promote fairness and equity in personal injury lawsuits.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Comparative negligence laws are designed to promote fairness and equity in personal injury lawsuits. They do not typically lead to lengthy and complex trials, make it difficult for plaintiffs to recover damages, or encourage parties to engage in risky behavior.

In a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction, what happens if the plaintiff is found to be 75% at fault for an accident?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced by 75%.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are increased by 75%.

  4. The plaintiff is awarded punitive damages.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

In a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault, up to a certain threshold. In this case, the plaintiff's damages would be reduced by 75%.

Which of the following is NOT a factor that courts consider when determining the degree of fault of a party in a comparative negligence case?

  1. The conduct of the party

  2. The foreseeability of the accident

  3. The severity of the injuries

  4. The amount of damages suffered

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The amount of damages suffered by a party is not a factor that courts consider when determining the degree of fault of that party in a comparative negligence case.

In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, what happens if the plaintiff is found to be 25% at fault for an accident?

  1. The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages.

  2. The plaintiff's damages are reduced by 25%.

  3. The plaintiff's damages are increased by 25%.

  4. The plaintiff is awarded punitive damages.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

In a pure comparative negligence jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages are reduced in proportion to their degree of fault. In this case, the plaintiff's damages would be reduced by 25%.

- Hide questions
ADVERTISEMENT

Find more quizzes from top tags

general knowledge
3615 Quizzes
119858 Questions
 technology
307 Quizzes
36705 Questions
 sports
963 Quizzes
19148 Questions
 history
1187 Quizzes
13475 Questions
 physics
598 Quizzes
13441 Questions
 biology
1160 Quizzes
12174 Questions
 science & technology
551 Quizzes
11015 Questions
 chemistry
490 Quizzes
9892 Questions
 maths
518 Quizzes
9324 Questions
 softskills
0 Quizzes
7131 Questions