The Problem of Divine Hiddenness argues that if God exists, then there should be some evidence of God's existence in the world. However, there is no such evidence, which makes it irrational to believe in God.

David Hume is the philosopher most closely associated with the Problem of Divine Hiddenness. He argued that the lack of evidence for God's existence is a strong argument against the belief in God.

The evidential argument from evil argues that the existence of evil in the world is evidence against the existence of God. If God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving, then why does evil exist?

The free will defense to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness argues that God hides his existence in order to give humans free will. If God were to reveal himself, then humans would be forced to believe in him, which would undermine their free will.

Skeptical theists respond to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness by arguing that God's existence is unknowable. They believe that there is no way to prove or disprove the existence of God, so it is ultimately a matter of faith.

Fideists respond to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness by arguing that faith is the only way to know God. They believe that reason is insufficient to prove or disprove the existence of God, so faith is the only way to bridge the gap between humans and God.

Agnostics respond to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness by arguing that God's existence is unknowable. They believe that there is no way to prove or disprove the existence of God, so it is impossible to say for certain whether or not God exists.

Atheists respond to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness by arguing that God does not exist. They believe that the lack of evidence for God's existence is sufficient to conclude that God does not exist.

The evidential argument from evil is not a response to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness. It is an argument against the existence of God based on the existence of evil.

A common criticism of the free will defense is that it is based on a false dichotomy. The defense assumes that the only two options are either God exists and hides his existence in order to give humans free will, or God does not exist. However, there are other possible explanations for the lack of evidence for God's existence.

A common criticism of the skeptical theist response is that it is based on a false dichotomy. The response assumes that the only two options are either God exists and his existence is unknowable, or God does not exist. However, there are other possible explanations for the lack of evidence for God's existence.

A common criticism of the fideist response is that it is circular. The response assumes that faith is the only way to know God, and then uses this assumption to justify the belief in God. However, this is a circular argument because it relies on the very thing that it is trying to prove.

A common criticism of the agnostic response is that it is irrelevant to the question of God's existence. The response simply states that it is impossible to know whether or not God exists, but this does not answer the question of whether or not God actually exists.

A common criticism of the atheist response is that it is based on a false dichotomy. The response assumes that the only two options are either God exists or God does not exist. However, there are other possible explanations for the lack of evidence for God's existence.