In a democracy, the media is expected to be independent and objective, and should not be used to promote the interests of the government.

The rise of social media, the decline of traditional media, and the increasing polarization of Indian society have all contributed to the increasing influence of the media in Indian politics.

Confirmation bias, framing bias, and agenda-setting bias are all types of media bias.

The media can influence public opinion by providing information about political issues, framing the issues in a particular way, and promoting certain candidates or parties. However, the media cannot influence public opinion by suppressing information about political issues.

Government censorship, corporate control of the media, and self-censorship by journalists are all challenges to media freedom in India.

The media can be held accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by the public and by the media itself. However, the government cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion.

The public can hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by boycotting media outlets that they believe are biased, by writing letters to the editor or contacting media outlets to express their concerns, and by supporting independent media outlets. However, the public cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by voting for politicians who support media freedom.

The media can be held accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by the public and by the media itself. However, the government cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion.

The public can hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by boycotting media outlets that they believe are biased, by writing letters to the editor or contacting media outlets to express their concerns, and by supporting independent media outlets. However, the public cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by voting for politicians who support media freedom.

The media can be held accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by the public and by the media itself. However, the government cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion.

The public can hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by boycotting media outlets that they believe are biased, by writing letters to the editor or contacting media outlets to express their concerns, and by supporting independent media outlets. However, the public cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by voting for politicians who support media freedom.

The media can be held accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by the public and by the media itself. However, the government cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion.

The public can hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by boycotting media outlets that they believe are biased, by writing letters to the editor or contacting media outlets to express their concerns, and by supporting independent media outlets. However, the public cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by voting for politicians who support media freedom.

The media can be held accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by the public and by the media itself. However, the government cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion.

The public can hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by boycotting media outlets that they believe are biased, by writing letters to the editor or contacting media outlets to express their concerns, and by supporting independent media outlets. However, the public cannot hold the media accountable for its role in shaping public opinion by voting for politicians who support media freedom.