The greatest happiness for the greatest number.

The pursuit of individual self-interest.

The maximization of social welfare.

The minimization of social costs.

John Stuart Mill

Jeremy Bentham

David Ricardo

Thomas Malthus

Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of individual actions, while rule utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of general rules.

Act utilitarianism focuses on the intentions of the actor, while rule utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of the action.

Act utilitarianism is concerned with maximizing happiness, while rule utilitarianism is concerned with minimizing suffering.

Act utilitarianism is a subjective theory, while rule utilitarianism is an objective theory.

It is impossible to compare the utility of different people.

It is difficult to compare the utility of different people.

It is easy to compare the utility of different people.

It is not necessary to compare the utility of different people.

A hypothetical situation in which people are unaware of their own personal characteristics and circumstances.

A hypothetical situation in which people are aware of their own personal characteristics and circumstances.

A hypothetical situation in which people are unaware of the consequences of their actions.

A hypothetical situation in which people are aware of the consequences of their actions.

A utilitarian believes that the government should intervene in the economy to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number, while a libertarian believes that the government should not intervene in the economy.

A utilitarian believes that the government should not intervene in the economy, while a libertarian believes that the government should intervene in the economy to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

A utilitarian believes that the government should intervene in the economy to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number, while a libertarian believes that the government should intervene in the economy to promote individual liberty.

A utilitarian believes that the government should not intervene in the economy, while a libertarian believes that the government should intervene in the economy to promote individual liberty.

It is too focused on maximizing happiness and ignores other important values, such as justice and fairness.

It is too difficult to apply in practice, as it is often impossible to determine which action will produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

It is too subjective, as it relies on the individual's own assessment of what constitutes happiness.

All of the above.

It is a simple and straightforward theory that is easy to understand.

It is a flexible theory that can be applied to a wide range of situations.

It is a theory that is consistent with our common sense morality.

All of the above.

Yes, it is a good ethical theory because it promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

No, it is not a good ethical theory because it ignores other important values, such as justice and fairness.

I'm not sure, I need to think about it more.

I don't know.

The decision to build a new highway that will benefit many people, even if it means displacing some people from their homes.

The decision to provide free healthcare to all citizens, even if it means raising taxes.

The decision to ban smoking in public places, even if it means that some people will have to give up smoking.

All of the above.

It is often difficult to determine which action will produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

It is often difficult to measure the happiness of different people.

It is often difficult to weigh the happiness of different people against each other.

All of the above.

Yes, I think it is a useful ethical theory that can be used to make good decisions.

No, I do not think it is a useful ethical theory that can be used to make good decisions.

I'm not sure, I need to think about it more.

I don't know.

The number of people who will be affected by the decision.

The intensity of the happiness or unhappiness that will be caused by the decision.

The distribution of the happiness or unhappiness that will be caused by the decision.

All of the above.

Yes, I think it is a good ethical theory for guiding public policy.

No, I do not think it is a good ethical theory for guiding public policy.

I'm not sure, I need to think about it more.

I don't know.