In Indian epistemology, logic is primarily used to establish the validity of arguments, rather than to determine the truth of statements. This is because the truth of a statement is often dependent on the context in which it is made, and logic cannot always account for this.

Appeal to ignorance is not a type of logical fallacy identified in Indian epistemology. The other three options are all types of logical fallacies that are discussed in Indian philosophical texts.

In Indian epistemology, logic and perception are considered to be mutually dependent. This means that logic cannot be used to establish the truth of a statement without reference to perception, and perception cannot be used to establish the validity of an argument without reference to logic.

Analogy is not a type of pramāṇa, or source of knowledge, in Indian epistemology. The other three options are all types of pramāṇa that are discussed in Indian philosophical texts.

In the process of knowledge acquisition, logic is used to establish the validity of arguments. This is because knowledge is often acquired through the process of reasoning, and logic provides the tools to determine whether or not a particular argument is valid.

Appeal to ignorance is not a type of logical fallacy identified in Indian epistemology. The other three options are all types of logical fallacies that are discussed in Indian philosophical texts.

In Indian epistemology, logic and perception are considered to be mutually dependent. This means that logic cannot be used to establish the truth of a statement without reference to perception, and perception cannot be used to establish the validity of an argument without reference to logic.

Analogy is not a type of pramāṇa, or source of knowledge, in Indian epistemology. The other three options are all types of pramāṇa that are discussed in Indian philosophical texts.

In the process of knowledge acquisition, logic is used to establish the validity of arguments. This is because knowledge is often acquired through the process of reasoning, and logic provides the tools to determine whether or not a particular argument is valid.

Appeal to ignorance is not a type of logical fallacy identified in Indian epistemology. The other three options are all types of logical fallacies that are discussed in Indian philosophical texts.

In Indian epistemology, logic and perception are considered to be mutually dependent. This means that logic cannot be used to establish the truth of a statement without reference to perception, and perception cannot be used to establish the validity of an argument without reference to logic.

Analogy is not a type of pramāṇa, or source of knowledge, in Indian epistemology. The other three options are all types of pramāṇa that are discussed in Indian philosophical texts.

In the process of knowledge acquisition, logic is used to establish the validity of arguments. This is because knowledge is often acquired through the process of reasoning, and logic provides the tools to determine whether or not a particular argument is valid.

Appeal to ignorance is not a type of logical fallacy identified in Indian epistemology. The other three options are all types of logical fallacies that are discussed in Indian philosophical texts.

In Indian epistemology, logic and perception are considered to be mutually dependent. This means that logic cannot be used to establish the truth of a statement without reference to perception, and perception cannot be used to establish the validity of an argument without reference to logic.