To answer this question, you need to be familiar with the nickname "Der Kaiser" and its association with a particular footballer.

Option A) Lothar Matthäus - This option is incorrect because Lothar Matthäus is not commonly referred to as "Der Kaiser." He is a former German footballer, but his nickname is "Loddar."

Option B) Franz Beckenbauer - This option is correct. Franz Beckenbauer, a German footballer and manager, is commonly known by the nickname "Der Kaiser." He earned this nickname due to his commanding presence and leadership on the field.

Option C) Oliver Kahn - This option is incorrect. Oliver Kahn, another German footballer, is not known as "Der Kaiser." He is often called "Der Titan" due to his exceptional goalkeeping skills.

Option D) Miroslav Klose - This option is incorrect. Miroslav Klose, a former German footballer, is not associated with the nickname "Der Kaiser." He is known for being the all-time leading goal scorer in FIFA World Cup history.

The correct answer is B) Franz Beckenbauer. This option is correct because he is commonly referred to as "Der Kaiser" in the footballing world.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to have knowledge of football clubs and their nicknames. Let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:

Option A) Everton - This option is incorrect because the nickname of Everton is "The Toffees," not "Pensioners."

Option B) Chelsea - This option is correct. Chelsea is known as "The Pensioners" because the club is located in the Chelsea neighborhood of London, which is known for its large population of retired military personnel.

Option C) Fulham - This option is incorrect. The nickname of Fulham is "The Cottagers," not "Pensioners."

Option D) Hull City - This option is incorrect. The nickname of Hull City is "The Tigers," not "Pensioners."

The correct answer is B) Chelsea. This option is correct because Chelsea is nicknamed "The Pensioners" due to its location in the Chelsea neighborhood of London.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, we need to understand the context of the situation. Sachin Tendulkar, a renowned Indian cricketer, was known for his exceptional batting skills.

In this particular instance, he was stumped by a bowler who bowled a negative line. Stumping is a method of dismissing a batsman in cricket when the wicket-keeper removes the bails while the batsman is out of his crease.

Let's go through each option to determine who got Sachin Tendulkar out:

Option A) Saqlain Mushtaq - This option is incorrect because Saqlain Mushtaq, a Pakistani cricketer, was a spin bowler known for his off-breaks. There is no record of Saqlain Mushtaq stumping Sachin Tendulkar with a negative line.

Option B) Muralitharan - This option is incorrect because Muttiah Muralitharan, a Sri Lankan cricketer, was a spin bowler known for his off-spin. There is no record of Muralitharan stumping Sachin Tendulkar with a negative line.

Option C) Ashley Giles - This option is correct because Ashley Giles, an English cricketer, was a left-arm spinner. There is a record of Ashley Giles stumping Sachin Tendulkar with a negative line.

Option D) Shane Warne - This option is incorrect because Shane Warne, an Australian cricketer, was a leg-spinner. There is no record of Shane Warne stumping Sachin Tendulkar with a negative line.

The correct answer is C) Ashley Giles. This option is correct because Ashley Giles, a left-arm spinner, stumped Sachin Tendulkar with a negative line.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, we need to analyze the given information.

The question states that Sachin got out on exactly 100 runs in the Singapore Cup, and he was stumped. We need to identify which off-spinner was responsible for taking Sachin's wicket.

Let's go through each option to determine the correct answer:

Option A) Harbhajan Singh - This option is incorrect because Harbhajan Singh is an Indian off-spinner, and the question refers to the Singapore Cup.

Option B) Mushtaq Ahmed - This option is incorrect because Mushtaq Ahmed is a Pakistani leg-spinner, not an off-spinner.

Option C) Arshad Khan - This option is incorrect because Arshad Khan is a Pakistani left-arm spinner, not an off-spinner.

Option D) Saqlain Mushtaq - This option is correct because Saqlain Mushtaq is a Pakistani off-spinner. He is well-known for his variations and was a key player in the Pakistani cricket team. Therefore, the correct answer is option D.

In conclusion, the correct answer is D) Saqlain Mushtaq because he is an off-spinner who could have stumped Sachin on exactly 100 runs in the Singapore Cup.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to be familiar with the nicknames of various football clubs.

Option A) Everton - This option is incorrect because the nickname of Everton Football Club is "The Toffees" or "The Blues", not "Pensioners".

Option B) Chelsea - This option is correct. Chelsea Football Club is nicknamed "The Pensioners". This nickname refers to the fact that the club was founded in 1905 by a group of pensioners who were residents at the Royal Hospital Chelsea.

Option C) Fulham - This option is incorrect. The nickname of Fulham Football Club is "The Cottagers".

Option D) Hull City - This option is incorrect. The nickname of Hull City Football Club is "The Tigers".

The correct answer is B) Chelsea. This option is correct because Chelsea Football Club is nicknamed "The Pensioners".

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, we need to understand the context of the 1996 World Cup and the incident involving Sachin Tendulkar and Mark Waugh.

In the 1996 World Cup, Sachin Tendulkar was stumped off a wide ball bowled by Mark Waugh. Now let's analyze each option to determine who stumped Sachin Tendulkar:

Option A) Adam Gilchrist - This option is incorrect because Adam Gilchrist was not involved in stumping Sachin Tendulkar during the 1996 World Cup.

Option B) Jimmy Maher - This option is incorrect because Jimmy Maher was not involved in stumping Sachin Tendulkar during the 1996 World Cup.

Option C) Matthew Elliot - This option is incorrect because Matthew Elliot was not involved in stumping Sachin Tendulkar during the 1996 World Cup.

Option D) Ian Healy - This option is correct because Ian Healy was the wicketkeeper who stumped Sachin Tendulkar off a wide ball bowled by Mark Waugh in the 1996 World Cup.

Therefore, the correct answer is D) Ian Healy.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, we need to understand the context of the infamous Sydney test. In the Sydney test match between Australia and India in 2008, there was a controversial stumping decision involving Andrew Symonds and Harbhajan Singh.

The correct answer is A) Billy Bowden. Billy Bowden was the third umpire who gave Andrew Symonds not out of a stumping decision in the infamous Sydney test.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation