0

RC Step - 5

Description: GRE RC
Number of Questions: 12
Created by:
Tags: GRE RC Reading Comprehension Inference Specific Details Explain/Resolve Critical Reasoning Conclusion Vocabulary in context
Attempted 0/12 Correct 0 Score 0

Which of the following statements would explain the phrase “dug its own grave” in the above context?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

The reduction in personal and corporate tax rates came as a Christmas present for the common man. People believe that high taxes were hindering growth of industry and business and added to the miseries of the common man. The government is not enthused by the public response and feels that in trying to earn public goodwill it has dug its own grave.

  1. The government realized that there might be a hue and cry for further reductions.

  2. The tax reduction was supposed to be a temporary gimmick designed to pull in public vote at the ensuing elections.

  3. The government expected lukewarm response to the measures and strong criticism from the opposition for doling out public money.

  4. The government will have to curtail its unproductive expenses to bear the losses.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect. Here the government is not necessarily digging its own grave, although this could be opening Pandora's Box. Also, the fact that the common man sees these sops as Christmas presents indicates satisfaction. (2) Correct. The government will have dug its grave if it did something which will damage its own cause later. Now, something commissioned as an election stunt can't be rolled back. (3) Incorrect. The response is better than expected. In such a scenario, the government would be pleased as much. (4) Incorrect. Curtailing of unproductive expense would not be a cause for displeasure. (5) Incorrect. Though tempting, the option does not justify the government digging its own grave. Government indeed has other sources of income and could tap into those.

Why are the “categories "true and false" so inadequate” in the case of philosophy?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Metaphysical principles are less easily verified from experience than physical hypotheses, but also less easily refuted. Systems of philosophy, therefore, are not so dependent on our progressive knowledge of facts as the theories of natural science, and change less quickly; notwithstanding their mutual conflicts, and in spite of the talk about discarded standpoints, they possess in a measure the permanence of classical works of art, they retain for all time a certain relative validity. The thought of Plato, of Aristotle, and of the heroes of modern philosophy is ever proving anew its fructifying power. Nowhere do we find such instructive errors as in the sphere of philosophy; nowhere is the new so essentially a completion and development of the old, even though it deem itself the whole and assume a hostile attitude toward its predecessors; nowhere is the inquiry so much more important than the final result; nowhere the categories "true and false" so inadequate. The spirit of the time and the spirit of the people, the individuality of the thinker, disposition, will, fancy--all these exert a far stronger influence on the development of philosophy, both by way of promotion and by way of hindrance, than in any other department of thought. If a system gives classical expression to the thought of an epoch,’ a nation, or a great personality; if it seeks to attack the world-riddle from a new direction, or brings us nearer its solution by important original conceptions, by a subtler or a simpler comprehension of the problem, by a wider outlook or a deeper insight; it has accomplished more than it could have done by bringing forward a number of indisputably correct principles.

  1. The true and false are different only in form, not in substance.

  2. There is nothing inherently true or false in a philosophical theory.

  3. Various philosophical interpretations have a sort of hierarchy of truths.

  4. Since philosophical tenets cannot be tested for validity, it is difficult to prove their truthfulness.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Option (1): 'Inadequate categories' does not mean true and false are no different in substance. Option (2): This does not reason why categories "true and false" are so inadequate. So, the option is ruled out. Option (3): The categories are inadequate means there are other options or shades that cannot strictly be included in one of these categories. Hence, this option is the correct answer. Option (4): 'Cannot be tested' renders this option incorrect. The passage says that philosophical tenets are less easily verified, but does not say that they cannot be verified. Option (5): Not only truths but untruths also are relative in philosophy, but the option talks only about truths.

Which of the following represents best the key point of argument of the passage?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Metaphysical principles are less easily verified from experience than physical hypotheses, but also less easily refuted. Systems of philosophy, therefore, are not so dependent on our progressive knowledge of facts as the theories of natural science, and change less quickly; notwithstanding their mutual conflicts, and in spite of the talk about discarded standpoints, they possess in a measure the permanence of classical works of art, they retain for all time a certain relative validity. The thought of Plato, of Aristotle, and of the heroes of modern philosophy is ever proving anew its fructifying power. Nowhere do we find such instructive errors as in the sphere of philosophy; nowhere is the new so essentially a completion and development of the old, even though it deem itself the whole and assume a hostile attitude toward its predecessors; nowhere is the inquiry so much more important than the final result; nowhere the categories "true and false" so inadequate. The spirit of the time and the spirit of the people, the individuality of the thinker, disposition, will, fancy--all these exert a far stronger influence on the development of philosophy, both by way of promotion and by way of hindrance, than in any other department of thought. If a system gives classical expression to the thought of an epoch,’ a nation, or a great personality; if it seeks to attack the world-riddle from a new direction, or brings us nearer its solution by important original conceptions, by a subtler or a simpler comprehension of the problem, by a wider outlook or a deeper insight; it has accomplished more than it could have done by bringing forward a number of indisputably correct principles.

  1. Philosophical tenets are evolutionary, rather than being revolutionary.

  2. The ancient philosophy of Plato and Aristotle has nuggets of wisdom valid even in the present age.

  3. Philosophical principles are metaphysical and hence, cannot be easily verified.

  4. Philosophical thought is akin to natural sciences in certain aspects, though it essentially remains metaphysical in nature.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Option (1): Philosophical principles are of gradual not of radical changes. They “possess in a measure the permanence of classical works of art, they retain for all time a certain relative validity.” Also “nowhere is the new so essentially a completion and development of the old”. Thus, (1) is the correct answer. Option (2): The passage is about philosophy not about Plato or Aristotle. The option is too specific to select as answer. Option (3): This option rephrases only the opening line of the passage. It is not the main theme of the passage. Nor does it cover all the aspects of the passage. Thus, it is ruled out. Option (4): This is not the key point of the argument. This is only a supporting fact to elucidate the main theme of the passage. Thus, the option is eliminated. Option (5): The latter part of the option renders it incorrect.

Why is the thought of Plato and Aristotle “proving anew its fructifying power”?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Metaphysical principles are less easily verified from experience than physical hypotheses, but also less easily refuted. Systems of philosophy, therefore, are not so dependent on our progressive knowledge of facts as the theories of natural science, and change less quickly; notwithstanding their mutual conflicts, and in spite of the talk about discarded standpoints, they possess in a measure the permanence of classical works of art, they retain for all time a certain relative validity. The thought of Plato, of Aristotle, and of the heroes of modern philosophy is ever proving anew its fructifying power. Nowhere do we find such instructive errors as in the sphere of philosophy; nowhere is the new so essentially a completion and development of the old, even though it deem itself the whole and assume a hostile attitude toward its predecessors; nowhere is the inquiry so much more important than the final result; nowhere the categories "true and false" so inadequate. The spirit of the time and the spirit of the people, the individuality of the thinker, disposition, will, fancy--all these exert a far stronger influence on the development of philosophy, both by way of promotion and by way of hindrance, than in any other department of thought. If a system gives classical expression to the thought of an epoch,’ a nation, or a great personality; if it seeks to attack the world-riddle from a new direction, or brings us nearer its solution by important original conceptions, by a subtler or a simpler comprehension of the problem, by a wider outlook or a deeper insight; it has accomplished more than it could have done by bringing forward a number of indisputably correct principles.

  1. Although certain philosophers have out-rightly rejected aspects of their thought, it still finds support among others.

  2. Plato and Aristotle had proved validity of their concepts and efforts of certain modern day thinkers to reject their usefulness are futile.

  3. Fresh interpretation leads to the relative validity of concepts earlier thought to be outmoded.

  4. Aristotle and Plato have proved mighty resilient, efforts of modern day thinkers to debunk them, notwithstanding.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Option (1): The passage does not provide any description of rejection or acceptance of Plato's and Aristotle's thought. Thus, the option is ruled out. Option (2): Nowhere in the passage is it stated that Plato and Aristotle had proved validity of their concepts. So, the option is discarded. Option (3): This can be inferred from the preceding lines about “certain relative validity” of old concepts fructifying anew. Thus, (3) is the correct answer. Option (4): Nowhere does the passage say that modern thinkers try to debunk Aristotle and Plato. Option (5): The passage suggests that nowhere is the new so essentially a completion and development of the old. 'Permanence' cannot be inferred since new modifies and develops the old.

According to the passage, which of the following is a tenet of Eastern philosophy?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

While the East has always been more favourable towards the pre-ordained destiny model of life, West has embraced the ‘actions ordain destiny’ model of thinking.

While the general direction of life has been attributed by the East to a preordained destiny intricately conjoined with actions of the past lives and subsequent Karma accrued, the deliberate actions of this life are often geared towards accrual of a better karma, which in turn will help in the afterlife and rebirth and the cycle is endless till a spirit evolves so much that it becomes a part of the ‘Supreme Soul’ thereby attaining Moksha. In a manner of speaking, the life that is being lived today is directly linked to the previous life and will impact the lives to come. As we pass this marker, there seems to be a certain confluence of the two divergent philosophies in that the concept of an accession to heaven or a descent into hell is dictated by the actions of this life.

A book on a case study by a leading psychiatrist from U.S.A. has set the cat among the legions of spiritualists and philosophers. The learned doctor, who used hypnotic therapy to treat the symptoms of a present day disease of his patient claims to have found proof of the cycle of births and rebirths. Initially a skeptic, the psychiatric was amazed when the patient took him onto journeys into her past lives ranging from the stone ages to the middle ages to just centuries ago. Supposedly, during the therapy of the aforesaid patient, not only did the doctor find proof of reincarnation, but also found a common, invisible thread that binds the spirits that are close in this birth into other past lives as well. Working on the theory of probabilities, it is also well nigh conceivable that what is true for the past will remain steadfast for the future also. According to the doctor, or rather his inference of the past life events of his patient, every birth that we take is to help us spiritually evolve to the next level of consciousness. As long as we remain trapped by the same thoughts and beliefs, our forward journey into the next level is impossible. A spirit chooses its time of rebirth and death, even the sex, circumstances and the family that it will reincarnate withm but the learning has to be taken to the next level before it can proceed to the next level of consciousness.

Maybe, the cycle of birth and death in itself is a manifestation of hell and heaven with evolving spirits moving up to the next level of consciousness and progressively closer to a final communion with the Holy Spirit, while the spirits which are tied down by the petty events and emotions of the present are sentenced to hell by the virtue of having to go through similarly painful experiences till the time they learn to break free. The intervening period between death and the next rebirth is perhaps a period of silent introspection while suspended in a state of flux.

  1. Every action of one’s life is pre-determined.

  2. Life and death is an endless cycle.

  3. Reincarnation takes place within the same clique of spirits.

  4. Today is inextricably linked to yesterday and tomorrow.

  5. Death is the initiation into a posture of inner contemplation.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

(1) Not every action - Deliberate actions specifically mentioned (2) Untrue - it ends in Moksha (3) This is doctor’s research, not Eastern philosophy. (4) True- as it is mentioned in the 1st paragraph (5) It is author’s hypothesis- not mentioned in Eastern philosophy which mentions results of Karma

Which of the following generalisations is the author most likely to agree with?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

While the East has always been more favourable towards the pre-ordained destiny model of life, West has embraced the ‘actions ordain destiny’ model of thinking.

While the general direction of life has been attributed by the East to a preordained destiny intricately conjoined with actions of the past lives and subsequent Karma accrued, the deliberate actions of this life are often geared towards accrual of a better karma, which in turn will help in the afterlife and rebirth and the cycle is endless till a spirit evolves so much that it becomes a part of the ‘Supreme Soul’ thereby attaining Moksha. In a manner of speaking, the life that is being lived today is directly linked to the previous life and will impact the lives to come. As we pass this marker, there seems to be a certain confluence of the two divergent philosophies in that the concept of an accession to heaven or a descent into hell is dictated by the actions of this life.

A book on a case study by a leading psychiatrist from U.S.A. has set the cat among the legions of spiritualists and philosophers. The learned doctor, who used hypnotic therapy to treat the symptoms of a present day disease of his patient claims to have found proof of the cycle of births and rebirths. Initially a skeptic, the psychiatric was amazed when the patient took him onto journeys into her past lives ranging from the stone ages to the middle ages to just centuries ago. Supposedly, during the therapy of the aforesaid patient, not only did the doctor find proof of reincarnation, but also found a common, invisible thread that binds the spirits that are close in this birth into other past lives as well. Working on the theory of probabilities, it is also well nigh conceivable that what is true for the past will remain steadfast for the future also. According to the doctor, or rather his inference of the past life events of his patient, every birth that we take is to help us spiritually evolve to the next level of consciousness. As long as we remain trapped by the same thoughts and beliefs, our forward journey into the next level is impossible. A spirit chooses its time of rebirth and death, even the sex, circumstances and the family that it will reincarnate withm but the learning has to be taken to the next level before it can proceed to the next level of consciousness.

Maybe, the cycle of birth and death in itself is a manifestation of hell and heaven with evolving spirits moving up to the next level of consciousness and progressively closer to a final communion with the Holy Spirit, while the spirits which are tied down by the petty events and emotions of the present are sentenced to hell by the virtue of having to go through similarly painful experiences till the time they learn to break free. The intervening period between death and the next rebirth is perhaps a period of silent introspection while suspended in a state of flux.

  1. The life that is being lived today is indirectly linked to the previous life.

  2. The spirits which are tied down by the emotions of the present are sentenced to hell.

  3. Eastern and Western philosophies are in total discord over afterlife experiences.

  4. Afterlife is a state of reflection.

  5. A spirit gets reborn generally within a close circle of kindred spirits.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

(1) It is the Eastern philosophy and not his. (2) It is not his research, he’s just quoting someone. (3) No, they are not. He mentions a point of confluence in 1st paragraph. (4) It is the correct option as he concludes by saying that. (5) It is nowhere mentioned.

Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

While the East has always been more favourable towards the pre-ordained destiny model of life, West has embraced the ‘actions ordain destiny’ model of thinking.

While the general direction of life has been attributed by the East to a preordained destiny intricately conjoined with actions of the past lives and subsequent Karma accrued, the deliberate actions of this life are often geared towards accrual of a better karma, which in turn will help in the afterlife and rebirth and the cycle is endless till a spirit evolves so much that it becomes a part of the ‘Supreme Soul’ thereby attaining Moksha. In a manner of speaking, the life that is being lived today is directly linked to the previous life and will impact the lives to come. As we pass this marker, there seems to be a certain confluence of the two divergent philosophies in that the concept of an accession to heaven or a descent into hell is dictated by the actions of this life.

A book on a case study by a leading psychiatrist from U.S.A. has set the cat among the legions of spiritualists and philosophers. The learned doctor, who used hypnotic therapy to treat the symptoms of a present day disease of his patient claims to have found proof of the cycle of births and rebirths. Initially a skeptic, the psychiatric was amazed when the patient took him onto journeys into her past lives ranging from the stone ages to the middle ages to just centuries ago. Supposedly, during the therapy of the aforesaid patient, not only did the doctor find proof of reincarnation, but also found a common, invisible thread that binds the spirits that are close in this birth into other past lives as well. Working on the theory of probabilities, it is also well nigh conceivable that what is true for the past will remain steadfast for the future also. According to the doctor, or rather his inference of the past life events of his patient, every birth that we take is to help us spiritually evolve to the next level of consciousness. As long as we remain trapped by the same thoughts and beliefs, our forward journey into the next level is impossible. A spirit chooses its time of rebirth and death, even the sex, circumstances and the family that it will reincarnate withm but the learning has to be taken to the next level before it can proceed to the next level of consciousness.

Maybe, the cycle of birth and death in itself is a manifestation of hell and heaven with evolving spirits moving up to the next level of consciousness and progressively closer to a final communion with the Holy Spirit, while the spirits which are tied down by the petty events and emotions of the present are sentenced to hell by the virtue of having to go through similarly painful experiences till the time they learn to break free. The intervening period between death and the next rebirth is perhaps a period of silent introspection while suspended in a state of flux.

  1. Oriental and Western spiritualism have nothing in common.

  2. The cycle of birth and death is a manifestation of heaven and hell.

  3. Hypnosis therapy can be used to cure diseases.

  4. Spirituality is an evolving subject.

  5. Past life regression can be used to heal trauma of previous lives.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

(1) There is a point of confluence in 1st para: “there seems to be a certain confluence of the two divergent philosophies”. (2) This is an opinion quoted, with a big ‘Maybe’. (3) Only the doctor does it; others may or may not agree. (4) True – Manifestation of hell and heaven with evolving spirits moving up to the next level of consciousness and progressively closer to a final communion with the Holy Spirit. (5) Nowhere mentioned

What does the phrase 'infinite good is being bought' mean?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

The treasure of wisdom and science, which all men desire by an instinct of nature, infinitely surpasses all the riches of the world; in respect of which precious stones are worthless; in comparison with which silver is clay and pure gold is just a little sand; at whose splendor the sun and the moon are dark; compared with whose marvelous sweetness honey is bitter to the taste. In books I find the dead as if they were alive; in books I foresee things to come; in books warlike affairs are set forth; from books come forth the laws of peace. We must consider what pleasantness of teaching there is in books, how easy, how secret! How safely we lay bare the poverty of human ignorance to books without feeling any shame! They are masters who instruct us without rod or ferule, without angry words, without money. The value of books is unspeakable; no dearness of price ought to hinder a man from the buying of books, if he has the money that is demanded for them, unless it be to withstand the malice of the seller or to await a more favorable opportunity of buying. For if it is wisdom only that makes the price of books, which is an infinite treasure to mankind, and if the value of books is immeasurable, how shall the bargain be shown to be dear where an infinite good is being bought?

  1. The books bestow endless human values and intellect in all.

  2. The books lend the goodness of boundless morality to their readers.

  3. The books propel humans to work as the protagonists with utmost rectitude.

  4. The intellect, knowledge, and judiciousness instilled by the books are priceless.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Option (1): The lines do not only talk about human values. Option (2): The lines do not only talk about morality. Option (3): It is not mentioned in the passage. Thus it can be safely eliminated. Option (4): It can be inferred from “For if it is wisdom ……… bought? Option (5): The option is too general.

What does the phrase 'poverty of human ignorance' mean?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

The treasure of wisdom and science, which all men desire by an instinct of nature, infinitely surpasses all the riches of the world; in respect of which precious stones are worthless; in comparison with which silver is clay and pure gold is just a little sand; at whose splendor the sun and the moon are dark; compared with whose marvelous sweetness honey is bitter to the taste. In books I find the dead as if they were alive; in books I foresee things to come; in books warlike affairs are set forth; from books come forth the laws of peace. We must consider what pleasantness of teaching there is in books, how easy, how secret! How safely we lay bare the poverty of human ignorance to books without feeling any shame! They are masters who instruct us without rod or ferule, without angry words, without money. The value of books is unspeakable; no dearness of price ought to hinder a man from the buying of books, if he has the money that is demanded for them, unless it be to withstand the malice of the seller or to await a more favorable opportunity of buying. For if it is wisdom only that makes the price of books, which is an infinite treasure to mankind, and if the value of books is immeasurable, how shall the bargain be shown to be dear where an infinite good is being bought?

  1. One cannot hide one's ignorance when one comes face to face with books.

  2. Ignorance punctuates the wisdom of human beings when it is exposed to learning

  3. Engrossed in reading, we discover our own ignorance and come across our intellect.

  4. The dubious aspects of knowledge that lay bare our conscience.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Option (1): It is not the question of not hiding, but of no guilt feeling on exposure to books. Option (2): This does not propagate the meaning of the given phrase. Ignorance does not punctuate wisdom. Option (3): This can be inferred from 'We must consider ………. without feeling shame”. Option (4): These lines talk about books and not conscience. Thus the option is eliminated. Option (5): The option is irrelevant to the passage. Thus it can be safely eliminated.

Which of the options critically completes the passage?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Many surveys and studies have been conducted asking buyers what traits they value most in sellers. This information is invaluable for those who truly want to be toward the top of the sales profession. Some of the traits buyers say they want to see in sellers are their being: honest, knowledgeable, organized, punctual, solution-oriented, and empathic. For some sellers, these come very naturally, while for others perhaps it’s a constant struggle to exhibit these traits.
Nearly all the traits can be summed up in one word _________.

 

  1. skillful

  2. methodical

  3. professional

  4. trustworthy

  5. business-like


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; skillful doesn't qualify the skills required. (2) Incorrect; methodical can only be equated with being organized. (3) Correct; most skills mentioned- honesty, punctuality, organized, punctual and solution- orientation can be summed into this one trait. (4) Incorrect; trustworthiness is only one part of the skills listed- honesty. (5) Incorrect; business-like would mean being only business oriented.

What assumption does the author make to reach the conclusion?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

Tastes of people for travel destinations have changed manifold over the last few years. A recent survey revealed that sixty percent of people preferred going to mountains for vacations which is more than twice the preference in last year’s survey. Happy Home group of hotels has decided to shut down the operation of three of its resorts in coastal part of the country. Other hotels, operational in tourist spots in adjacent areas, will also suffer in the coming years.

  1. The popularity graph of mountains as a tourist destination will continue to rise.

  2. The mountains will pull the tourists away from coastal or other areas in peak season.

  3. The trend towards mountainous destinations is at the cost of other tourist destinations.

  4. Tourist traffic to other destinations will be sufficient only during vacations.

  5. Both the surveys covered the same or similar sample populace.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect. (1) is not inherent, because even if the level stabilizes, the conclusion will still be true. (2) Incorrect. (2) is rendered incorrect by a particular season only (peak season). Even if mountains pull away tourists from other areas in peak season, other areas might remain busy in other parts of the year. (3) Correct. If we withdraw the assumption at (3), the conclusion is automatically negated. Only if travelers forsake other areas for mountains will the hotels in other vacation spots lose clients. (4) Incorrect. If people choose going to these vacation spots during vacations (during other times tourist traffic is still there, though less than 'sufficient'), the hotels might not be forced to close. (5) Incorrect. This assumption, not its withdrawal, will negate the conclusion. If the surveys covered same/ similar populace, the group might not be representative of entire population and the conclusion will not hold.

If the argument above is true, which of the following must also be true?

Directions: Answer the question based on the following passage.

The investigative journalists and the public at large believe that the bombings in Wreckville were politically inspired. However, the government report on the same day called it a racially motivated heinous act. During the last 5 years, all the terrorist strikes conducted by Dukhara, the world’s largest terrorist group, had a racial background. It is, therefore, certain that the attack on Wreckville was wrongly ascribed to the government agencies and the investigative reports were inspired by extraneous considerations.

 

  1. Dukhara is racially motivated.

  2. Investigative journalists are more painstaking than government agencies are.

  3. The government agencies investigated the Wreckville bombings independently.

  4. The bombings in Wreckville were definitely conducted by Dukhara.

  5. The population of Wreckville is made up of people from different nationalities.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

(1) Correct. All the terrorist strikes conducted by Dukhara over the past 5 years have been ascribed to racial background. So we might conclude that Dukhara is indeed racially motivated. Thus we can see that the conclusion becomes true if Dukhara is racially motivated. (2) What if investigative journalists had not been as painstaking. The conclusion will rather be strengthened. (3) Whether the investigation by the government departments was independent or not does not materially affect the outcome. There could at best be a doubt, but the conclusion is not altogether negated. (4) It is by no means certain that the bombings were carried out be Dukhara, though there are pointers to this. (5) 'Different nationalities' is not the same thing as different races.

- Hide questions